Helene Miller v. City of Chicago Department of Law, et al
| HELENE TONIQUE LAURENT MILLER, formerly known as HELENE TONIQUE WILLIAMS |
| CITY OF CHICAGO DEPARTMENT OF LAW, CAROLINE J. FRONCZAK, DANIELLE CLAYTON and WILLIAM COOK |
| 23-1402 |
| March 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 15 copies Filed Petition for Rehearing by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. DIST. [11] [7307359] [23-1402] (CAH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 12:47 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: On consideration of the papers filed in this appeal and review of the short record, this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details). Diane S. Sykes, Chief Judge; Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [10] [7306597] [23-1402] (HTP) [Entered: 04/27/2023 08:47 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, William Cook and Caroline J. Fronczak. [9] [7297787] [23-1402] (Weiss, Alexandra) [Entered: 03/16/2023 09:39 AM] |
| Filing 8 Added Attorney Alexandra Weiss for Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, Caroline J. Fronczak and William Cook., in case 23-1402 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Alexandra Weiss for Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, Caroline J. Fronczak and William Cook. [8] [7297675] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-1402]--[Edited 03/15/2023 by MAN to reflect addition of counsel] (Weiss, Alexandra) [Entered: 03/15/2023 03:48 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: Filed clerk's notice to Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, William Cook and Caroline J. Fronczak to file a response to APPELLANTS [SIC] JURISDICTION MEMORANDUM!, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of 03/07/2023. Response due for Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, William Cook and Caroline J. Fronczak by 03/21/2023. DW [7] [7297279] [23-1402] (MAN) [Entered: 03/14/2023 12:54 PM]
|
| Filing 6 Appellants jurisdiction memorandum! filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. [6] [7297150] [23-1402] (KRA) [Entered: 03/14/2023 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller to be granted!. [5] [7296026] [23-1402] (KRA) [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 21-2412, 21-2474, 21-2781, 22-1403, 22-2262, 22-2727, 22-3003, 22-3270, 22-3251 [4] [7296025] [23-1402] (KRA) [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 Appearance form filed by Attorney Stephen Collins for Appellees City of Chicago Department of Law, Danielle Clayton, William Cook and Caroline J. Fronczak. [3] [7295932] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-1402] ]--[Edited 03/08/2023 by ER - terminated Attorney Patrick Halpin O'Connor and added Attorney Stephen G. Collins.] (Collins, Stephen) [Entered: 03/08/2023 11:27 AM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7295759] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 03/21/2023. DW [2] [7295759] [23-1402] (MAN) [Entered: 03/07/2023 03:01 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Helene Tonique Laurent Miller by 03/09/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 03/17/2023. [1] [7295413] [23-1402] (AP) [Entered: 03/06/2023 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
