Robert Young v. Bradley Robert, et al
Petitioner / Appellant: ROBERT P. YOUNG
Respondent / Appellee: BRADLEY J. ROBERT, J.B. PRITZKER and MICHAEL P. RANDLE
Case Number: 23-1436
Filed: March 8, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER: On consideration of Status Report filed by appellee on April 28, 2023, appellee shall file, on or before May 15, 2023, a further status report regarding the disposition of petitioner-appellants motion for reconsideration. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW. [14] [7307391] [23-1436] (HTP) [Entered: 05/01/2023 02:18 PM]
April 28, 2023 Filing 13 Filed status report by Appellee Bradley J. Robert. [13] [7306896] [23-1436] (Doersch, Katherine) [Entered: 04/28/2023 09:15 AM]
April 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re: Status report of 04/14/2023. IT IS ORDERED that appellee file, on or before April 28, 2023, a further status report regarding the disposition of petitioner-appellants motion for reconsideration. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW. [12] [7304110] [23-1436] (AP) [Entered: 04/14/2023 03:29 PM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 11 Filed status report by Appellee Bradley J. Robert. [11] [7303909] [23-1436] (Doersch, Katherine) [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:05 AM]
March 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER: On consideration of Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellee on March 28, 2023, the appellee shall file, on or before April 14, 2023, a status report regarding the disposition of petitioner-appellants motion for reconsideration. Briefing shall continue to be SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [10] [7301010] [23-1436] (CG) [Entered: 03/31/2023 09:13 AM]
March 28, 2023 Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee Bradley J. Robert. [9] [7300208] [23-1436] (Doersch, Katherine) [Entered: 03/28/2023 09:04 AM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 8 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [8] [7298956] [23-1436] (CAG) [Entered: 03/21/2023 04:34 PM]
March 21, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Mr. Robert P. Young. [7] [7298773] [23-1436] (CAG) [Entered: 03/21/2023 10:27 AM]
March 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Paper. IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before March 29, 2023, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 10, 2023. [6] [7298576] [23-1436] (AP) [Entered: 03/20/2023 03:29 PM]
March 20, 2023 Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Mr. Robert P. Young. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 10-2916 [5] [7298496] [23-1436] (CAG) [Entered: 03/20/2023 01:15 PM]
March 16, 2023 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Mr. Robert P. Young. [4] [7297915] [23-1436] (CAG) [Entered: 03/16/2023 01:58 PM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 3 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Robert P. Young. [3] [7297111] [23-1436] (AD) [Entered: 03/13/2023 04:55 PM]
March 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A notice of appeal filed before the district court issues its ruling on a timely Rule 59 motion is ineffective until the order disposing of the motion is entered on the district court's civil docket. Appellant shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be STAYED pending the entry of the order disposing of the motion. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to FRAP 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [2] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Robert P. Young by 03/23/2023. DW [2] [7296487] [23-1436] (MAN) [Entered: 03/10/2023 09:09 AM]
March 8, 2023 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/22/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Robert P. Young by 03/14/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/22/2023 for Appellant Robert P. Young. [1] [7296093] [23-1436] (FP) [Entered: 03/08/2023 04:56 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Robert Young v. Bradley Robert, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERT P. YOUNG
Represented By: Robert P. Young
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: BRADLEY J. ROBERT
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: J.B. PRITZKER
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: MICHAEL P. RANDLE
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?