Kevin Thomas v. Financial Builders F.C.U., et al
| KEVIN THOMAS |
| FINANCIAL BUILDERS F.C.U. and JEREMY R. PEELLE |
| 23-1439 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Katherine E. Tapp for Appellees Financial Builders F.C.U. and Jeremy R. Peelle. [13] [7308642] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-1439] [Edited 05/05/2023 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Tapp, Katherine) [Entered: 05/05/2023 03:29 PM] |
| Filing 12 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [12] [7305808] [23-1439] (LCP) [Entered: 04/24/2023 04:05 PM] |
| Filing 11 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Jeremy Andrew Peelle for Appellees Financial Builders F.C.U. and Jeremy R. Peelle has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [11] [7303918] [23-1439] (LJ) [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7303419] [23-1439] (KRA) [Entered: 04/12/2023 01:49 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Kevin Thomas leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/03/2023. [9] [7301499] [23-1439] (AP) [Entered: 04/03/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 8 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Forwarded from the district court. [8] [7301396] [23-1439] (AP) [Entered: 04/03/2023 11:40 AM] |
| Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Party Kevin Thomas. Forwarded by the district court. [7] [7301392] [23-1439] (AP) [Entered: 04/03/2023 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order dated 03/28/2023, the motions do not indicate Plaintiff failed to receive notice of the court's final judgment within 21 days of its entry. Accordingly, there is no basis to extend the deadline to appeal. Plaintiff's motions (Filing Nos. 33 & 34 ) are DENIED. Forwarded to SCR. [6] [7301317] [23-1439] (CAG) [Entered: 04/03/2023 09:41 AM] |
Filing 5
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [5] [7298834] [23-1439] (CG) [Entered: 03/21/2023 12:13 PM]
|
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7298705] [23-1439] (KRA) [Entered: 03/21/2023 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7298694] [23-1439] (KRA) [Entered: 03/21/2023 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 2 Jurisdictional Statement filed by Appellant Kevin Thomas. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7298692] [23-1439] (KRA) [Entered: 03/21/2023 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Kevin Thomas by 03/13/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 03/22/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/22/2023 for Appellant Kevin Thomas. [1] [7296192] [23-1439] (MAN) [Entered: 03/09/2023 10:09 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
