Carl Drucker, II v. Barbara Riggs, et al
| CARL J. DRUCKER, II |
| BARBARA RIGGS, NAVEEN RAJOLI, KIM HOBSON and SAMUEL BYRD |
| 23-1491 |
| March 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Sarah J. Shores-Scisney for Appellees Naveen Rajoli, Kim Hobson, Samuel Byrd and Barbara Riggs has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7305358] [23-1491] (LJ) [Entered: 04/21/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Suggestion of death. Appellant Carl Drucker II died after filing his appeal in this court. Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 43(a)(1) provides that in the event of the death of a party while the appeal is pending, the decedents personal representative may be substituted as a party to the action by applying in writing to this court for permission to proceed with the appeal. Appellees have informed the court that Mr. Druckers daughter, Rebekkah Blanton, is his next of kin and have provided contact information for her. Accordingly, Ms. Blanton is notified that she may file a motion in this court to be substituted as a party pursuant to Rule 43(a)(1). Any motion to substitute or statement of intent should be filed by July 17, 2023. If nothing is filed by that date, this appeal may be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The clerk shall send Ms. Blanton a copy of this courts public docket with this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 0500. MRO [7] [7305162] [23-1491] (HTP) [Entered: 04/20/2023 11:40 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Notice of death of Appellant Carl J. Drucker, II. [6] [6] [23-1491] (Johnson, Rachel) [Entered: 04/18/2023 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Carl J. Drucker, II leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/03/2023. District Court has assessed a $5.05 initial partial filing fee. [5] [7301312] PLRA initial partial filing fee due by 05/03/2023. [23-1491] (CAG) [Entered: 04/03/2023 09:35 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed notice of error in filing by Appellant Carl J. Drucker, II. [4] [7300096] [23-1491] (CAG) [Entered: 03/27/2023 03:40 PM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Appellant Carl J. Drucker, II to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [3] [7300077] [23-1491] (CAG) [Entered: 03/27/2023 03:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rachel D. Johnson for Appellees Samuel Byrd, Kim Hobson, Naveen Rajoli and Barbara Riggs. [2] [7298501] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-1491] [Edited 03/20/2023 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Johnson, Rachel) [Entered: 03/20/2023 01:36 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/29/2023. [1] [7297531] [23-1491] (HTP) [Entered: 03/15/2023 12:16 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
