Ronald Van Pelt v. David Mitchell
Petitioner / Appellant: RONALD M. VAN PELT
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Case Number: 23-1548
Filed: March 22, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
May 8, 2023 Filing 10 Prose motion filed by Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [10] [7308957] [23-1548] (CAH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 02:58 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 9 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt for appointment of counsel. [9] [7308954] [23-1548] (CAH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 02:57 PM]
May 2, 2023 Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellee David Mitchell. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7307718] [23-1548] (Doersch, Katherine) [Entered: 05/02/2023 01:11 PM]
May 1, 2023 Filing 7 Prose motion filed by Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [7] [7307491] [23-1548] (LCP) [Entered: 05/01/2023 03:58 PM]
April 27, 2023 Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7306827] [23-1548] (CAH) [Entered: 04/27/2023 03:44 PM]
April 14, 2023 Filing 5 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/13/2023. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/15/2023 for Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt [7303908] [5] [7303908] [23-1548] (AP) [Entered: 04/14/2023 09:04 AM]
April 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt by 04/20/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 3136. [4] [7302240] [23-1548] (AD) [Entered: 04/06/2023 07:59 AM]
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [3] [7301707] [23-1548] (CG) [Entered: 04/04/2023 09:36 AM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7301496] [23-1548] (CAG) [Entered: 04/03/2023 02:56 PM]
March 22, 2023 Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 02/27/2023. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt by 03/29/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/05/2023 for Appellant Ronald M. Van Pelt. Transcript information sheet due by 04/05/2023. [1] [7299330] [23-1548] (HTP) [Entered: 03/23/2023 10:21 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ronald Van Pelt v. David Mitchell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: RONALD M. VAN PELT
Represented By: Ronald M. Van Pelt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID MITCHELL
Represented By: Katherine M. Doersch
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?