Steven Anderson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
STEVEN ANDERSON |
WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., VENERIO SANTOS, LANA NALEWAJKA, ANISSA SHAW and GLENN SLANE |
23-1710 |
April 14, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file [ # 6 ] IT IS ORDERED that the motion for extension of time is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by June 15, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the appellant shall file the overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by June 15, 2023. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3395 7556. [7] [7311704] CDH [23-1710] (AP) [Entered: 05/19/2023 11:21 AM] |
Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Steven Anderson for extension of time. [6] [7311482] [23-1710] (CAG) [Entered: 05/18/2023 01:31 PM] |
Filing 5 ORDER issued GRANTING motion for withdrawal. [ # 4 ] Attorney Kenneth J. Mallin, Jr. may withdraw from further representation of appellant Steven Anderson. Appellant Steven Anderson is reminded that he will be proceeding pro se in this matter unless he secures new counsel. This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellant's fee status has been resolved. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellant's fee status has not yet been determined. The appellant is reminded that he must either pay the $505.00 appellate filing fees or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis with the district court by May 15, 2023. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. Further, the appellant shall file the overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by May 15, 2023. Failure to comply with this order may result in the dismissal of the appeal. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 0593. CDH [5] [7307358] [23-1710] (PS) [Entered: 05/01/2023 12:41 PM] |
Filing 4 Motion filed by Attorney Kenneth J. Mallin for Appellant Steven Anderson to withdraw as counsel [4] [7307026] [23-1710]--[Edited 04/28/2023 by MAN to reflect attorney filer] (Mallin, Kenneth) [Entered: 04/28/2023 01:26 PM] |
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellees Wexford Health Sources, Inc. and Venerio Santos. [3] [7304245] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-1710]--[Edited 04/17/2023 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 04/17/2023 11:13 AM] |
Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Joe Loera, Jon Fatheree, Michelle Dulle, Ira Jack, Trevor Chitwood and Aaron Toennies. [2] [7304022] [23-1710] (ER) [Entered: 04/14/2023 12:48 PM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven Anderson by 04/20/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/15/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 04/28/2023. [1] [7304013] [23-1710] (ER) [Entered: 04/14/2023 12:35 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.