Nancy Roe v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: NANCY ROE
Defendant / Appellant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY, ALYSA ROLLOCK and KATIE SERMERSHEIM
Case Number: 23-1743
Filed: April 19, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. [5] [7314743] [22-2890, 23-1743] (HTP) [Entered: 06/02/2023 04:25 PM]
May 24, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. [4] [7312562] [23-1743] (AP) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:52 AM]
April 25, 2023 Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7305977] [23-1743] (Kealey, William) [Entered: 04/25/2023 10:46 AM]
April 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The court orders these appeals CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition: Appellants' joint consolidated brief due on or before 06/14/2023 for Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. Appellee's consolidated brief due on or before 07/14/2023 for Nancy Roe. Appellants' joint consolidated reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/04/2023 for Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. DW [2] [7305260] [22-2890, 23-1743] (ER) [Entered: 04/20/2023 03:16 PM]
April 19, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee Waived Docketing Statement due for Appellants Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim by 04/25/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 05/03/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 05/30/2023 for Board of Trustees of Purdue University, Alysa Rollock and Katie Sermersheim. [1] [7304943] [23-1743] (ER) [Entered: 04/19/2023 02:45 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Nancy Roe v. Board of Trustees of Purdue University, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: NANCY ROE
Represented By: Jeffrey A. Macey
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF PURDUE UNIVERSITY
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ALYSA ROLLOCK
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: KATIE SERMERSHEIM
Represented By: William Peter Kealey
Represented By: Joseph Heavrin Harrison III
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?