Roberto Cruz-Rivera v. USA
ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
23-1747 |
April 19, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER re: Affidavit Accompanying Motion for Permission to Appeal In Foma Pauperis. [ # 6 ] Before the court is the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. A review of the courts docket shows that on June 2, 2023, this appeal was dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b) and Circuit Rule 3(c). The court will construe the appellants filing as an implied request to recall the mandate. Construed as such, the request to recall the mandate is DENIED without prejudice to renewal in a motion that includes a tendered Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. Any such motion should be filed by July 10, 2023. DW [7] [7316143] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:56 AM] |
Filing 6 Prose motion filed by Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [6] [7316142] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 06/09/2023 11:53 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b) and 3(c). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [5] [7314517] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 06/02/2023 09:01 AM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 06/02/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7314527-2] [7314527] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 06/02/2023 09:20 AM] |
Filing 4 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/25/2023 for Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera. [4] [7309710] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 05/11/2023 09:17 AM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera by 05/18/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 3440. [3] [7308146] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 05/04/2023 08:57 AM] |
Filing 2 An order has been received from the District Court dated 04/28/2023, denying a certificate of appealability. These appeals shall proceed accordingly. [2] [7306973] [23-1747, 23-1791] (JR) [Entered: 04/28/2023 11:57 AM] |
Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 05/03/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera by 04/24/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 05/03/2023 for Appellant Roberto Cruz-Rivera. [1] [7305173] [23-1747] (AD) [Entered: 04/20/2023 12:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Roberto Cruz-Rivera v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ROBERTO CRUZ-RIVERA | |
Represented By: | Roberto Cruz-Rivera |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Adam Eakman |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.