Joseph Hartsock v. Indiana Department of Correction, et al
| JOSEPH HARTSOCK |
| INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, ROBERT CARTER, JR., JAMES BASINGER, ROBERT BUGHER and KRISTEN DAUSS, Doctor |
| 23-1783 |
| April 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time. [ # 6 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). Because the appellants fee status has not yet been determined, the court has not set a briefing schedule. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal should this appeal proceed to briefing. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis, the motion is GRANTED. The appellant shall either pay the $505.00 required appellate filing fees in the district court or file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and PLRA memorandum in support with the clerk of this court by July 17, 2023. The clerk shall send the appellant an asset affidavit form. CDH [7] [7317222] [23-1783] (PS) [Entered: 06/15/2023 10:58 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Joseph Hartsock for extension of time. [6] [7317018] [23-1783] (DAB) [Entered: 06/14/2023 01:59 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed district court order dated 06/01/2023, Plaintiff later filed a copy of his prison trust account statement and other documents in support of his motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. To the extent these filings constitute a renewed motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal, that motion is denied. Plaintiff's motions for transcripts of proceedings are denied because there were no transcribed proceedings in this action. [5] [7314411] [23-1783] (CAG) [Entered: 06/01/2023 02:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Joseph Hartsock leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 05/15/2023. [4] [7310386] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/14/2023 [23-1783] (CAG) [Entered: 05/15/2023 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7306289] [23-1783] (HTP) [Entered: 04/26/2023 09:28 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: John Schilling, Dave Liebel, Charlene Burkett, Brittney Smith, Wexford Of Indiana, Llc, Aramark, and Greg Sheward. [2] [7306288] [23-1783] (HTP) [Entered: 04/26/2023 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing statement filed. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/25/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 05/09/2023. [1] [7306275] [23-1783] (HTP) [Entered: 04/26/2023 09:12 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
