Chris Jacobs, III v. Chad Billeb
CHAD BILLEB, Sheriff, Marathon County |
CHRIS J. JACOBS, III |
23-1855 |
May 3, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed Applicant Chris J. Jacobs, III list of questions for defendants to be a part of the record. [2] [7308912] [23-1855] (CAH) [Entered: 05/08/2023 02:14 PM] |
Filing 1 Application for an order authorizing the District Court to consider a second or successive petition for collateral review under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 docketed. [1] [7308643] [23-1855] (PS) [Entered: 05/05/2023 03:29 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Chris Jacobs, III v. Chad Billeb | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Applicant: CHRIS J. JACOBS, III | |
Represented By: | Chris J. Jacobs III |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: CHAD BILLEB, Sheriff, Marathon County | |
Represented By: | Wisconsin Department of Justice - Habeas |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.