William Buck v. Dennis Young, et al
| WILLIAM J. BUCK |
| DENNIS YOUNG, JOEL SLAVENS, RYAN CALLAIS, ANTHONY WILLS and BRANDY TRIPP |
| 23-1882 |
| May 9, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that briefing will proceed as follows: [ # 12 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 09/01/2023 for William J. Buck. Appellees' briefs due on or before 10/02/2023 for Ryan Callais, Jillian Crane, Pamela Hanna, Cortney Meyer, Joel Slavens, Jerry Witthoft, Correctional Officer, Dennis Young, Brandy Tripp and Anthony Wills. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 10/23/2023 for Appellant William J. Buck. The clerk will send the appellant this courts brief information sheet for pro se litigants so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the courts expectations for briefs. To the extent that the appellant seeks to order transcripts and copies of items from the record, he should make that request with the district court. CDH [13] [7318614] [22-2052, 23-1882] (HTP) [Entered: 06/22/2023 12:02 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant William J. Buck for extension of time. [12] [7318017] [23-1882] (KRA) [Entered: 06/20/2023 03:38 PM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion for appointment of counsel, filed on 6/7/2023. This court construes the appellants motion as a request to reconsider this courts order dated May 26, 2023. So construed, the motion is DENIED. [ # 10 ] SCR [11] [7316069] [23-1882, 22-2052] (FP) [Entered: 06/09/2023 09:54 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant William J. Buck in 23-1882, 22-2052 for appointment of counsel. [10] [7315658] [23-1882, 22-2052] (DAB) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant William J. Buck in 23-1882, 22-2052. [9] [7315651] [23-1882, 22-2052] (DAB) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant William J. Buck. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2052 [8] [7315645] [23-1882] (DAB) [Entered: 06/07/2023 03:24 PM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for counsel. The motion for recruitment of counsel is DENIED. See Pruitt v. Mote, 503 F.3d 647 (7th Cir. 2007) (en banc); Farmer v. Haas, 990 F.2d 319, 321 (7th Cir. 1993). The panel assigned to decide this case may recruit counsel if it finds that step appropriate after reviewing the briefs. Briefing in this consolidaed appeal will proceed according to the briefing schedule entered on May 22, 2023. [ # 7304539-2 ] SCR [7] [7313396] [22-2052, 23-1882] (ER) [Entered: 05/26/2023 12:50 PM]
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellant William J. Buck is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant William J. Buck by 06/05/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 3396. [6] [7312036] [23-1882] (AD) [Entered: 05/22/2023 12:25 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Motion. The appellants motion is GRANTED to the extent that this court will waive the filing fee for appeal no. 23-1882. No filing fee, including an initial partial filing fee, will be required for appeal no. 23-1882. Appeal nos. 22-2052 and 23-1882 are CONSOLIDATED for briefing and resolution. Briefing in the consolidated appeal shall proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 07/03/2023 for William J. Buck. Appellees' briefs due on or before 08/02/2023 for Ryan Callais, Jillian Crane, Pamela Hanna, Cortney Meyer, Joel Slavens, Jerry Witthoft, Correctional Officer, Dennis Young, Brandy Tripp and Anthony Wills. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 08/23/2023 for Appellant William J. Buck. [ # 4 ] SCR [5] [7312018] [22-2052, 23-1882] (HTP) [Entered: 05/22/2023 11:50 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant William J. Buck for clarification. [4] [7311478] [22-2052] (CAG) [Entered: 05/18/2023 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Alison J. Matusofsky for Brandy Tripp in 23-1882 terminated and added Attorney Julie Ann Teuscher for Appellee Brandy Tripp, in case 23-1882 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Julie A. Teuscher for Appellee Brandy Tripp in 23-1882, Appellee Cortney Meyer in 22-2052. Additional Parties: Jacob Weatherford & Melissa Pappas. [3] [7310042] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-1882, 22-2052]--[Edited 05/12/2023 by MAN to relect termination and addition of counsel] (Teuscher, Julie) [Entered: 05/12/2023 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Pamela Hanna, Jillian Crane, Larissa Wandro, Sylvia Butler, Melissa Pappas, Jacob Weatherford, Gail Walls, Courtney Meyer and Jerry Witthoft. [2] [7309416] [23-1882] (MAN) [Entered: 05/10/2023 09:58 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant William J. Buck by 04/24/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 06/08/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 05/23/2023. [1] [7309409] [23-1882] (MAN) [Entered: 05/10/2023 09:51 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
