Antwan Carruthers v. St. Joseph County Jail, et al
| ANTWAN M. CARRUTHERS, also known as MRS. EYE KEYLA MY. CARRUTHERS WASHINGTON |
| ST. JOSEPH COUNTY JAIL, OFFICER WOODY, Deputy and OFFICER MILLER, Deputy |
| 23-2001 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Antwan M. Carruthers to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7318355] [23-2001] (CAG) [Entered: 06/21/2023 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Antwan M. Carruthers leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/15/2023. [3] [7317453] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 07/17/2023 [23-2001] (CAG) [Entered: 06/16/2023 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7312886] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [23-2001] (PS) [Entered: 05/25/2023 12:05 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Antwan M. Carruthers by 05/30/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 06/08/2023. [1] [7312884] [23-2001] (PS) [Entered: 05/25/2023 12:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
