Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: ADAM BRAY
Defendant / Appellee: SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy, GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy and JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Case Number: 23-2080
Filed: May 25, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 18, 2023 Filing 14 15 copies Filed Petition for Rehearing by Appellant Adam Bray , per order. Dist. [14] [7324022] [23-2080] (CAG) [Entered: 07/18/2023 11:14 AM]
July 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER re: Memorandum in support of jurisdiction of appellant Adam Bray. The court will construe the appellants Memorandum as a motion to file a petition for rehearing after the deadline. So construed, the motion is GRANTED. The clerks office shall docket the Memorandum as a petition for panel rehearing and distribute it to the panel. [ # 12 ] SCR [13] [7323970] [23-2080] (HTP) [Entered: 07/18/2023 09:48 AM]
July 14, 2023 Filing 12 Filed Appellant Adam Bray Memorandum in support of jurisdiction of appellant. [12] [7323535] [23-2080] (CAG) [Entered: 07/14/2023 01:15 PM]
June 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details.) Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge; Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge and Amy J. St. Eve, Circuit Judge. [11] [7319233] [23-2080] (FP) [Entered: 06/26/2023 12:05 PM]
June 21, 2023 Filing 10 Motion filed by Appellees John Alexander, Gregory Dommer and Susan Wilkey Motion to Dismiss Appeal for Want of Jurisdiction. [10] [7318488] [23-2080] (Friedman, Shaw) [Entered: 06/21/2023 05:00 PM]
June 21, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER: Filed clerk's notice to Appellees John Alexander, Gregory Dommer and Susan Wilkey to file a response to PAPER, filed on June 14, 2023. Response due for Appellees John Alexander, Gregory Dommer and Susan Wilkey by 06/29/2023, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the court's order of May 30, 2023. DW [9] [7318331] [23-2080] (ER) [Entered: 06/21/2023 12:59 PM]
June 14, 2023 Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Adam Bray for jurisdictional memorandum in support of motion for appeal. [8] [7317954] [23-2080] (LCP) [Entered: 06/20/2023 02:46 PM]
June 6, 2023 Filing 7 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Adam Bray leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 06/06/2023. Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 30 day notice for failure to pay the docketing fee. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/06/2023 for Appellant Adam Bray. [7315335] [7] [7315335] [23-1849, 23-2080]. (CG) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:56 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 6 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [6] [7315055] [23-1849, 23-2080] (AD) [Entered: 06/05/2023 04:13 PM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellees John Alexander, Gregory Dommer and Susan Wilkey in 23-1849 to dismiss case. [5] [7314127] [23-1849, 23-2080] (Friedman, Shaw) [Entered: 05/31/2023 02:51 PM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney Shaw R. Friedman for Appellees John Alexander, Gregory Dommer and Susan Wilkey in 23-1849. [4] [7314022] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-1849, 23-2080]--[Edited 05/31/2023 by AD to reflect proper document filed.] (Friedman, Shaw) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:06 PM]
May 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Adam Bray shall file, on or before June 13, 2023, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7313815] [3] [7313815] [23-2080] (CG) [Entered: 05/30/2023 03:18 PM]
May 25, 2023 Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Adam Bray for certificate of appealability. [2] [7313353] [23-2080] (HTP) [Entered: 05/26/2023 11:54 AM]
May 25, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 06/08/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/08/2023 for Appellant Adam Bray. [1] [7313335] [23-2080] (HTP) [Entered: 05/26/2023 11:39 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Adam Bray v. Susan Wilkey, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: ADAM BRAY
Represented By: Adam Bray
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SUSAN WILKEY, Deputy
Represented By: Shaw R. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: GREGORY DOMMER, Deputy
Represented By: Shaw R. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOHN ALEXANDER, Deputy
Represented By: Shaw R. Friedman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?