Defreese Smith v. Bryan Cipolla, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: DEFREESE SMITH
Defendant / Appellee: BRYAN CIPOLLA, MARK MOTYKOWSKI, sued in his individual and person capacity as Sorter Supervisor of Sony DADC US Inc. (Bolingbrook Facility), THERESE SKALNIK, sued in her individual and person capacity as Human REsource Manager of Sony DADC US Inc. (Bolingbrook Facility), SONY DADC US.INC., (Bolingbrook Distribution Facility) sued in its official and as a Distribution Facility for Dony DADC US Inc., operating in Will County Illinois as a Music and a International Producer, Manufacturer and Marketer of Recorded Music and SONY DADC US, INC., (Bolingbrook Distribution Facility) sued in its official and as a Distribution Facility for Dony DADC US Inc., operating in Will County Illinois as a Music and a International Producer, Manufacturer and Marketer of Recorded Music
Case Number: 23-2117
Filed: June 5, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2023 Filing 12 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Defreese Smith in 23-2117, 23-2085 for decision on the fully briefed verified jurisdictional memorandum issue. [12] [7325008] [23-2117, 23-2085] (DAB) [Entered: 07/21/2023 02:34 PM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 11 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Bryan Cipolla, Mark Motykowski, Therese Skalnik and Sony Dadc US, Inc.. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [11] [7322553] [23-2117] (Buchheit, Jenny) [Entered: 07/11/2023 10:40 AM]
June 28, 2023 Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Defreese Smith. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 23-2085 [10] [7319963] [23-2117] (CAH) [Entered: 06/28/2023 01:02 PM]
June 28, 2023 Filing 9 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/12/2023 for Appellant Defreese Smith. [9] [7319881] [23-2117] (AD) [Entered: 06/28/2023 10:30 AM]
June 21, 2023 Filing 8 Filed Response by Appellees Mark Motykowski, Therese Skalnik, Sony Dadc US.Inc. and Bryan Cipolla in 23-2117 to Appellees' Response to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [8][7318224] [23-2117, 23-2085] (Buchheit, Jenny) [Entered: 06/21/2023 10:09 AM]
June 21, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Response by Appellees Bryan Cipolla and Sony Dadc US.Inc. in 23-2085, Appellees Mark Motykowski and Therese Skalnik in 23-2117 to Appellees' Response to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum. [7][7318223] [23-2085, 23-2117] (Buchheit, Jenny) [Entered: 06/21/2023 10:06 AM]
June 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: Appellant Defreese Smith is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Defreese Smith by 07/05/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0403 3839. [6] [7317824] [23-2117] (PS) [Entered: 06/20/2023 11:01 AM]
June 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Jurisdictional memorandum. IT IS ORDERED that appellees file, on or before June 23, 2023, a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of June 6, 2023. DW [5] [7317607] [23-2117] (AP) [Entered: 06/16/2023 02:12 PM]
June 12, 2023 Filing 4 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Defreese Smith. [4] [7316494] [23-2117] (KRA) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:29 PM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Jenny R. Buchheit, Isaac J. Colunga, Kayla M. Ernst for Appellees Therese Skalnik and Sony Dadc US.Inc. in 23-2117, Appellees Bryan Cipolla and Mark Motykowski in 23-2085. [3] [7315470] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-2117, 23-2085] [Edited 06/07/2023 by ER - added Attorneys Jenny R. Buchheit and Kayla M. Ernst for appellees in appeal no. 23-2117.] (Buchheit, Jenny) [Entered: 06/07/2023 10:05 AM]
June 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Defreese Smith shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7315302] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Defreese Smith by 06/20/2023. [2] [7315302] [23-2117] (FP) [Entered: 06/06/2023 02:11 PM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 06/20/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Defreese Smith by 06/07/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 06/20/2023 for Appellant Defreese Smith. [1] [7314913] [23-2117] (AD) [Entered: 06/05/2023 01:30 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Defreese Smith v. Bryan Cipolla, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DEFREESE SMITH
Represented By: Defreese Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BRYAN CIPOLLA
Represented By: Isaac J. Colunga
Represented By: Jenny R. Buchheit
Represented By: Kayla M. Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MARK MOTYKOWSKI, sued in his individual and person capacity as Sorter Supervisor of Sony DADC US Inc. (Bolingbrook Facility)
Represented By: Isaac J. Colunga
Represented By: Jenny R. Buchheit
Represented By: Kayla M. Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THERESE SKALNIK, sued in her individual and person capacity as Human REsource Manager of Sony DADC US Inc. (Bolingbrook Facility)
Represented By: Isaac J. Colunga
Represented By: Jenny R. Buchheit
Represented By: Kayla M. Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SONY DADC US.INC., (Bolingbrook Distribution Facility) sued in its official and as a Distribution Facility for Dony DADC US Inc., operating in Will County Illinois as a Music and a International Producer, Manufacturer and Marketer of Recorded Music
Represented By: Isaac J. Colunga
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: SONY DADC US, INC., (Bolingbrook Distribution Facility) sued in its official and as a Distribution Facility for Dony DADC US Inc., operating in Will County Illinois as a Music and a International Producer, Manufacturer and Marketer of Recorded Music
Represented By: Isaac J. Colunga
Represented By: Jenny R. Buchheit
Represented By: Kayla M. Ernst
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?