Terry Ferguson, et al v. Christopher Labno, et al
| TERRY FERGUSON, CHERIE FERGUSON, TRACE FERGUSON, TR. F., a minor, by his Father and Next Friend, TERRY FERGUSON and T. F., a minor, by her Father and Next Friend, TERRY FERGUSON |
| CHRISTOPHER LABNO, CHRISTOPHER STENZEL, BENNIE MIMS, CHRISTOPHER BURNEY and MADISON JOHNSON |
| 23-2163 |
| June 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed on July 19, 2023, this appeal shall be limited to a review of the order entered on May 23, 2023, denying appellants post-judgment motions. The appellants shall file their respective brief and required short appendix on or before August 29, 2023. DW [8] [7324846] [23-2163] (AD) [Entered: 07/21/2023 09:29 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellants T. F., Cherie Ferguson, TR. F., Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson. [7] [7324378] [23-2163] (Brindley, Beau) [Entered: 07/19/2023 02:58 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Appellants T. F., TR. F., Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be LIMIITED to a review of the order entered on 5/23/23, denying appellant's post-judgment motions. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7321336] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellants T. F., TR. F., Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson by 07/19/2023 [6] [7321336] [23-2163] (ER) [Entered: 07/05/2023 02:17 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants T. F., TR. F., Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [5] [7321040] [23-2163] (Brindley, Beau) [Entered: 07/03/2023 10:44 AM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellants T. F., TR. F., Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellants T. F., TR. F., Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson and Trace Ferguson by 07/10/2023. [4] [7319258] [23-2163] (AD) [Entered: 06/26/2023 12:24 PM]
|
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLANTS M.R., a minor, G.R., a minor, H.R, a minor, and M.R., a minor. APPELLEES Brett O'Connor, Craig Fries, Walter Buckie, Thomas Hamilton, Kenosha Wisconsin Police Department, Willowbrook Illinois Police Department, Ten Unknown Named Agents of the DuPage County Sheriff's Police, DuPage County Illinois Sheriff's Department, Ten Unknown Named Aents/Officer of the Willowbrook Illinois Police Department, Ten Unknown John Doe and Jane Doe Police Officers, City of Kenosha Wisconsin, and Village of Willowbrook. [3] [7316478] [23-2163] (CG) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7316468] [23-2163] (CG) [Entered: 06/12/2023 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson, Trace Ferguson, T. F., and TR. F by 06/16/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 06/26/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 07/24/2023 for Cherie Ferguson, Terry Ferguson, Trace Ferguson, T. F., and TR. F. [1] [7316453] [23-2163] (CG) [Entered: 06/12/2023 02:48 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
