Michael Swygart v. Mark Sevier
| MICHAEL P. SWYGART |
| MARK R. SEVIER, Warden |
| 23-2329 |
| July 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 06/14/2023. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 07/20/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Michael P. Swygart by 07/13/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 07/20/2023 for Appellant Michael P. Swygart. [1] [7322184] [23-2329] (FP) [Entered: 07/07/2023 04:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Michael Swygart v. Mark Sevier | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: MICHAEL P. SWYGART | |
| Represented By: | Michael P. Swygart |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: MARK R. SEVIER, Warden | |
| Represented By: | Jesse Drum |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
