Justin Dalcollo v. Anthony Wills, et al
| JUSTIN L. DALCOLLO |
| ANTHONY WILLS, FRANK LAWRENCE, JAMES MENDRICK, ROBERT B. BERLIN and ANTHONY SOVOBODA |
| 23-2348 |
| July 10, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 8, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 11
ORDER re: Motion. To the extent that the appellant needs more time to pay the $13.70 initial partial filing fee in appeal no. 23-2199, the appellant shall pay the initial partial filing fee in the district court by August 31, 2023. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of these appeals. Any other requested relief is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notices and orders dated June 15, 2023, and July 10, 2023. [ # 10 ] Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 2450 0001 4762 4488. CDH [11] [7328148] [23-2199, 23-2348] (HTP) [Entered: 08/08/2023 12:04 PM]
|
| Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Justin L. Dalcollo in 23-2199, 23-2348 requesting urgent assisstants. [10] [7327945] [23-2199, 23-2348] (CAG) [Entered: 08/07/2023 03:36 PM] |
|
Filing 9
ORDER: Amending order of 08/02/2023. re: Motion for extension or enlargement of time to file appellant brief. [ # 7321764-2 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellants fee status has been resolved. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket shows that on July 18, 2023, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and assessed a $13.70 initial partial filing fee in appeal no. 23-2199. Because the appellant has not yet paid the initial partial filing fee, this court has not set a briefing schedule. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal once the appellant has paid the initial partial filing fee. briefing in appeal no. 23-2348 is SUSPENDED pending resolution of the fee status in appeal no. 23-2199. CDH [7327235] [23-2199, 23-2348] (CG) [Entered: 08/03/2023 12:08 PM]
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion for extension or enlargement of time to file appellant brief. [ # 7 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings will remain suspended until the appellants fee status has been resolved. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket shows that on July 18, 2023, the district court granted the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and assessed a $13.70 initial partial filing fee. Because the appellant has not yet paid the initial partial filing fee, this court has not set a briefing schedule. Accordingly, to the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his opening brief, the motion is DENIED without prejudice to renewal once the appellant has paid the initial partial filing fee. [8] [7327038] CDH [23-2199, 23-2348] (CG) [Entered: 08/02/2023 02:20 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Justin L. Dalcollo in 23-2199, 23-2348 to extend time to file appellant's brief. [7] [7326811] [23-2199, 23-2348] (CAG) [Entered: 08/01/2023 02:37 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: Amending order of 07/13/2023 to reflect that the filing fee has been waived and to remove the language about the collection of the appellate fees for this appeal. [7324187] [23-2348] (JR) [Entered: 07/18/2023 05:11 PM]
|
|
Filing 5
ORDER: The District Court GRANTED the appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis and the initial partial filing fee has been waived. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 08/14/2023 for Justin L. Dalcollo [5] [7323252] [23-2348] (CAG) [Entered: 07/13/2023 02:26 PM]
|
|
Filing 4
ORDER: On June 15, 2023, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court's judgment, and appeal no. 23-2199 was opened. On June 22, 2023, the appellant filed another notice of appeal and a second appeal, 23-2238, was opened. The notices of appeal in 23-2199 and 23-2238 both seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that appeal no. 23-2238 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 23-2238 shall be imposed. On July 7, 2023, the appellant filed a third notice of appeal after the district court denied his motion to alter or amend the judgment, and appeal no. 23-2348 was opened. Because the motion to alter or amend was filed within 28 days of the judgment, no additional fee is required to file an appeal from the order denying the motion. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4)(B)(iii). Accordingly, IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no additional filing fee is due for appeal no. 23-2348. [4] [7322708] [23-2199, 23-2238, 23-2348] (ER) [Entered: 07/11/2023 04:02 PM]
|
| Filing 3 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [3] [7322542] [23-2348] (HTP) [Entered: 07/11/2023 10:03 AM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Jennifer Mapels, Candace Adams, Brian Telander, Kenneth Popejoy, Officer Shake (#544), Officer Cantwell (#553), Jacklyn McAndrew, Michael Dino, Officer Restivo (#361), Officer Cosdell (#648), Officer Rapp (#582), Officer Young (#259), Officer Charito (#459), Kent Kouba, Frank A. Grammerse, Officer Powell, Officer Everett, Deputy Lammert, Office Lafin, Bill White, Thomas Karalic and James E. Chadd. [2] [7322540] [23-2348] (HTP) [Entered: 07/11/2023 10:02 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. [1] [7322539] [23-2348] (HTP) [Entered: 07/11/2023 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
