Anthony Gavin v. Felicia Adkins
ANTHONY C. GAVIN |
FELICIA ADKINS, Warden, Warden, Danville Correctional Center |
23-2475 |
July 28, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER re: Motion for voluntary dismissal. [ # 6 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [7][7330825] [23-2475] (PS) [Entered: 08/21/2023 12:32 PM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/21/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7330834-2] [7330834] [23-2475] (PS) [Entered: 08/21/2023 12:41 PM] |
Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Anthony C. Gavin to dismiss case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) [6] [7330744] [23-2475] (CAG) [Entered: 08/21/2023 09:35 AM] |
Filing 5 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Anthony C. Gavin leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 08/10/2023. [5] [7328784] [23-2424, 23-2475] (JR) [Entered: 08/10/2023 04:38 PM] |
Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7328371] [23-2475] (AD) [Entered: 08/09/2023 10:10 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed District Court order dated 08/03/2023. Petitioners second motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal [52] is denied. The motion is essentially a duplicate of the prior IFP motion that was denied without prejudice by the Courts 07/25/2023, order. [51] The 08/29/2023, deadline for Petitioner to bring a proper IFP application or pay the appellate fees as set in the July 25th order remains in effect. [3] [7327474] [23-2424, 23-2475] (JR) [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:30 AM] |
Filing 2 ORDER: A preliminary review of the short record indicates that this appeal duplicates an earlier appeal filed on July 21, 2023, and docketed in this court as Appeal No. 23-2424. Only one appeal is necessary, the other should be dismissed. Harris v. Bellin Memorial Hospital, 13 F.3d 1082, 1083 (7th Cir. 1994). Accordingly, petitioner-appellant Anthony Gavin shall file, on or before August 14, 2023, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed as unnecessary. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. DW [7326619][2] [2] [7326619] [23-2475] (HTP) [Entered: 08/01/2023 08:56 AM] |
Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 07/12/2023. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Anthony C. Gavin by 08/03/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 08/11/2023. [1] [7326383] [23-2475] (CG) [Entered: 07/31/2023 10:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Anthony Gavin v. Felicia Adkins | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: ANTHONY C. GAVIN | |
Represented By: | Anthony C. Gavin |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: FELICIA ADKINS, Warden, Warden, Danville Correctional Center | |
Represented By: | Katherine M. Doersch |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.