Stanley Boclair v. Jacqueline Lashbrook, et al
| STANLEY BOCLAIR |
| JACQUELINE LASHBROOK, JOHN R. BALDWIN, BARRY MYERS, MICHAEL LAMINACK and PHILIP ROYSTER |
| 23-2602 |
| August 14, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7332441] [23-2602] (CAG) [Entered: 08/29/2023 08:41 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Stanley Boclair. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 23-1978 [3] [7332394] [23-2602] (DAB) [Entered: 08/28/2023 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Joshua Cornstubble, John Koch, Justin Engelage, Carson Winters and Ezra Hunter. [2] [7329231] [23-2602] (ER) [Entered: 08/14/2023 02:45 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Stanley Boclair by 08/21/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 09/13/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 08/28/2023. [1] [7329227] [23-2602] (ER) [Entered: 08/14/2023 02:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
