USA v. Thomas Zajac
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| THOMAS J. ZAJAC |
| 23-2611 |
| August 15, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [6] [7334752] [23-2611] (CAH) [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:07 PM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 08/18/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7334758-2] [7334758] [23-2611] (CAH) [Entered: 09/11/2023 12:14 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER re: 1. Defenses Request for a Stay Order on the District Courts August 29, 2023, [Mistrial] Makeup Trial [ # 2 ]. 2. Governments Response in Opposition to Motion to Stay Trial [ # 4 ]. the motion is DENIED and that this appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. Ordinarily, a defendant in a criminal case may not take an appeal until a judgment of conviction and sentence has been entered. See Flanagan v. United States, 465 U.S. 259, 263 (1984); United States v. Kaufman, 951 F.2d 793, 794 (7th Cir. 1992). Defendant-appellant Thomas Zajac appeals, for a fourth time, a pretrial order, this time the order entered on August 10, 2023. But, importantly, Zajac has been neither convicted nor sentenced for the federal crimes he is charged with having committed. There is no exception to the general rule requiring review at final judgment for orders seeking to enforce a right to a speedy trial. See United States v. MacDonald, 435 U.S. 850, 861 (1978); United States v. Bokhari, 757 F.3d 664, 668 (7th Cir. 2014). Zajac is set to go to trial on August 29, 2023. Now is not the time to appeal this order. Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge; Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge and Amy J. St. Eve, Circuit Judge. [5] [7330503] [23-2611] (MAN) [Entered: 08/18/2023 11:25 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellee USA Attorney G. DAVID ROJAS to GOVERNMENT'S RESPONSE IN OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY TRIAL. [4][7330480] [23-2611] (Rojas, George) [Entered: 08/18/2023 10:55 AM] |
| Filing 3 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Thomas J. Zajac. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [3] [7330251] [23-2611] (KRA) [Entered: 08/17/2023 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Thomas J. Zajac for a stay order on the District Court's August 29, 2023 [mistrial] makeup trial. [2] [7329891] [23-2611] (CAH) [Entered: 08/16/2023 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Thomas J. Zajac by 08/21/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 09/25/2023 for Thomas J. Zajac. Transcript information sheet due by 08/29/2023. [1] [7329740] [23-2611] (HTP) [Entered: 08/16/2023 09:07 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Thomas Zajac | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | George David Rojas II |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: THOMAS J. ZAJAC | |
| Represented By: | Thomas J. Zajac |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
