Fitzmark, LLC v. Robert Rogers, et al
Plaintiff / Appellee: FITZMARK, LLC
Defendant / Appellant: ROBERT ROGERS and TRAFFIC TECH INC.
Case Number: 23-2659
Filed: August 22, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Contract Actions
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 5, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER re: Appellants unopposed motion for voluntary dismissal. [ # 5 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [6][7333659] [23-2659] (PS) [Entered: 09/05/2023 12:10 PM]
September 5, 2023 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 09/05/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7333672-2] [7333672] [23-2659] (PS) [Entered: 09/05/2023 12:35 PM]
September 1, 2023 Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellants Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc. to dismiss case. [5] [7333484] [23-2659] (Abbate-Dattilo, Pamela) [Entered: 09/01/2023 02:29 PM]
August 28, 2023 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellants Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc.. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [4] [7332435] [23-2659] (VG) [Entered: 08/29/2023 08:15 AM]
August 28, 2023 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Lukas Boehning for Appellants Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc.. for Traffic Tech, Inc.. [3] [7332429] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [23-2659]--[Edited 08/29/2023 by FP to reflect that atty. Boehning is added to the docket.] (Boehning, Lukas) [Entered: 08/28/2023 11:10 PM]
August 28, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: Appellant Robert Rogers shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7332215] DW Brief memorandum due for Appellants Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc. by 09/12/2023. [2] [7332215] [23-2659] (FP) [Entered: 08/28/2023 09:56 AM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellants Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc. by 08/28/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 09/05/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 10/02/2023 for Robert Rogers and Traffic Tech Inc.. [1] [7331271] [23-2659] (ER) [Entered: 08/22/2023 02:59 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Fitzmark, LLC v. Robert Rogers, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: FITZMARK, LLC
Represented By: Alexander Pape Orlowski
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: ROBERT ROGERS
Represented By: Pamela A. Dattilo
Represented By: Zachary Myers VanVactor
Represented By: Pamela Abbate-Dattilo
Represented By: Lukas S. Boehning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: TRAFFIC TECH INC.
Represented By: Pamela A. Dattilo
Represented By: Zachary Myers VanVactor
Represented By: Pamela Abbate-Dattilo
Represented By: Lukas S. Boehning
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?