Theodore Allison El v. USA, et al
THEODORE ALLISON EL, Allison El of the House of El's, Bey's and Ali's |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, JANET YELLEN, DANIEL WERFEL, ANTONEY BLINKEN and ANTONY BLINKEN |
23-2706 |
August 29, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Theodore Allison El to recall the mandate. [5] [7342096] [23-2706] (CAG) [Entered: 10/17/2023 01:04 PM] |
Filing 4 ORDER: This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [4] [7341229] [23-2706] (AD) [Entered: 10/12/2023 11:33 AM] |
FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 10/12/2023 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7341232-2] [7341232] [23-2706] (AD) [Entered: 10/12/2023 11:37 AM] |
Filing 3 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/04/2023 for Appellant Theodore Allison El. [3] [7336755] [23-2706] (AD) [Entered: 09/20/2023 09:39 AM] |
Filing 2 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Theodore Allison El. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [2] [7334716] [23-2706] (AD) [Entered: 09/11/2023 11:05 AM] |
Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Theodore Allison El by 09/05/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 09/12/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/12/2023 for Appellant Theodore Allison El. [1] [7332576] [23-2706] (ER) [Entered: 08/29/2023 12:39 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.