Dakevee Wiggins v. Brian English
Respondent: BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden
Applicant: DAKEVEE WIGGINS
Case Number: 23-2775
Filed: September 12, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 12, 2023 Filing 1 Application for an order authorizing the District Court to consider a second or successive petition for collateral review under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 docketed. [1] [7335263] [23-2775] (AP) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:56 PM]
September 12, 2023 Case transferred from the Northern Indiana, South Bend Division. District Court Case Number: 3:23-cv-00734-HAB-SLC. [7335264-2] [7335264] [23-2775] (AP) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:57 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dakevee Wiggins v. Brian English
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Applicant: DAKEVEE WIGGINS
Represented By: Dakevee Wiggins
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: BRIAN ENGLISH, Warden
Represented By: Benjamin M. L. Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?