Steven Lindsey v. Ron Neal
| STEVEN L. LINDSEY |
| RON NEAL, Warden |
| 23-2789 |
| September 13, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 An order has been received from the District Court dated 10/27/2023, denying a certificate of appealability. This appeal shall proceed accordingly. [8] [7344687] [23-2789] (JR) [Entered: 10/30/2023 11:45 AM] |
Filing 7
ORDER: On consideration of the Jurisdictional Memorandum filed by appellant on September 26, 2023, and a review of the district court docket, this appeal shall proceed to a determination whether a certificate of appealability should issue. See Schott v. Katz, 829 F.3d 494, 496 (7th Cir. 2016); Davis v. Ruby Foods, Inc. 269 F.3d 818, 819 (7th Cir. 2001) (order dismissing case without prejudice to filing a complaint by a specified date became a final appealable judgment when the date passed without plaintiff filing anything). The briefing schedule remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [7342591] [23-2789] (HTP) [Entered: 10/19/2023 11:51 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Steven L. Lindsey. (Forwarded from the District Court). [6] [7338119] [23-2789] (CAG) [Entered: 09/26/2023 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [5] [7336964] [23-2789] (CAG) [Entered: 09/20/2023 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Steven L. Lindsey. Prior or Related proceedings: No. (Forwarded from the District Court). [4] [7335843] [23-2789] (CAG) [Entered: 09/15/2023 09:40 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: Petitioner-appellant Lindsey shall file, on or before October 2, 2023, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) DW [7335721] [3] [7335721] [23-2789] (PS) [Entered: 09/14/2023 02:44 PM]
|
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7335425] (Note: The Office of the IN Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [23-2789] (MAN) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:53 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability pending. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Steven L. Lindsey by 09/19/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 09/27/2023 for Appellant Steven L. Lindsey. Transcript information sheet due by 09/27/2023. [1] [7335424] [23-2789] (MAN) [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:50 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Steven Lindsey v. Ron Neal | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: STEVEN L. LINDSEY | |
| Represented By: | Steven L. Lindsey |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: RON NEAL, Warden | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
