USA v. Marcos Xelhua-Ponce
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| MARCOS XELHUA-PONCE |
| 23-2845 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Motion filed by Appellant Marcos Xelhua-Ponce To Hold Appeal In Abeyance. [2] [7338005] [23-2845] (Greenberg, Jonathan) [Entered: 09/26/2023 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. IFP. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/06/2023 for Marcos Xelhua-Ponce. [1] [7337790] [23-2845] (AD) [Entered: 09/25/2023 03:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: USA v. Marcos Xelhua-Ponce | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Kathryn Ginsberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: MARCOS XELHUA-PONCE | |
| Represented By: | Jonathan Greenberg |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
