USA v. Christopher Jordan
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| CHRISTOPHER JORDAN |
| 23-2849 |
| September 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Gregg Smith in 23-2840. [4] [7338203] [23-2840, 23-2846, 23-2849] (Shapiro, Alexandra) [Entered: 09/26/2023 05:36 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Alexandra A. E. Shapiro for Appellant Gregg Smith in 23-2840. [3] [7338200] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-2840, 23-2846, 23-2849] (Shapiro, Alexandra) [Entered: 09/26/2023 05:24 PM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders these appeals are CONSOLIDATED for purposes of briefing and disposition. The briefing schedule is as follows: Appellants' briefs due on or before 11/06/2023 for Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak and Christopher Jordan. Appellee's brief due on or before 12/06/2023 for United States of America. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 12/27/2023 for Appellants Gregg Smith, Michael Nowak and Christopher Jordan. (See order for details.) DW [2] [7338021] [23-2840, 23-2846, 23-2849] (CG) [Entered: 09/26/2023 12:22 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Christopher Jordan by 09/27/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 10/10/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/06/2023 for Christopher Jordan. [1] [7337653] [23-2849] (PS) [Entered: 09/25/2023 12:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
