Troy Kidwell v. USA
| TROY KIDWELL |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 23-2858 |
| September 26, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details.) Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Michael B. Brennan, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [9] [7344551] [23-2858] (FP) [Entered: 10/27/2023 03:43 PM]
|
| Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellee USA. [8] [7342487] [23-2858] (Hollar, David) [Entered: 10/19/2023 08:09 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: On consideration of the jurisdictional memorandum filed by appellant Troy Kidwell on October 10, 2023, the Government shall file, on or before October 20, 2023, a responsive memorandum addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of September 28, 2023. DW [7] [7341615] [23-2858] (AD) [Entered: 10/16/2023 08:56 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Troy Kidwell leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 10/12/2023. [6] [7341270] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/13/2023 [23-2858] (KRA) [Entered: 10/12/2023 01:11 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Troy Kidwell is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Troy Kidwell by 10/25/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 0006. [5] [7340953] [23-2858] (AD) [Entered: 10/11/2023 11:45 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Notification from the District Court that a motion to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is pending. [4] [7340893] [23-2858] (AP) [Entered: 10/11/2023 09:54 AM] |
| Filing 3 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Troy Kidwell. [3] [7340731] [23-2858] (CAH) [Entered: 10/10/2023 02:36 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Troy Kidwell shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7338778] DW Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Troy Kidwell by 10/12/2023. [2] [7338778] [23-2858] (FP) [Entered: 09/28/2023 01:50 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 05/24/2023. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 10/10/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Troy Kidwell by 09/20/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 10/10/2023 for Appellant Troy Kidwell. [1] [7337995] [23-2858] (FP) [Entered: 09/26/2023 11:44 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Troy Kidwell v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner / appellant: TROY KIDWELL | |
| Represented By: | Troy Kidwell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | David E. Hollar |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
