Herbert Pitts v. City of Chicago, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: HERBERT PITTS
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO and OFFICER MOORE
Case Number: 23-2859
Filed: September 26, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion. A review of the district courts docket shows that no appellees nor attorney for the appellees filed an appearance in the district court before the district court entered its final order and judgment. Because no appellees or counsel for the appellees were served by the district court or made an appearance in that court, there are no appellees involved in this appeal. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time, IT IS ORDERED that the request is GRANTED. The appellant shall file his overdue Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by November 16, 2023. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the opening brief and required short appendix of the appellant are due by December 6, 2023. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the Practitioners Handbook and the courts public docket. To the extent that the appellant seeks appointment of counsel, that request should be made in a separate motion that specifically makes such a request and includes reasons in support. CDH [5] [7345462] [23-2859] (AP) [Entered: 11/02/2023 10:49 AM]
November 1, 2023 Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Herbert Pitts for appointment of counsel. [4] [7345338] [23-2859] (CAG) [Entered: 11/01/2023 03:03 PM]
October 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant Herbert Pitts is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Herbert Pitts by 10/25/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3395 9994. [3] [7340950] [23-2859] (AD) [Entered: 10/11/2023 11:41 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7338001] (Note: The Office of the Corporation Counsel has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [23-2859] (ER) [Entered: 09/26/2023 11:54 AM]
September 26, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Herbert Pitts by 09/26/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 10/10/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 11/06/2023 for Herbert Pitts. [1] [7337991] [23-2859] (ER) [Entered: 09/26/2023 11:38 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Herbert Pitts v. City of Chicago, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: HERBERT PITTS
Represented By: Herbert Pitts
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF CHICAGO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: OFFICER MOORE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?