David Pannell v. Sarah Eads, et al
| DAVID PANNELL |
| SARAH EADS, KEITH HARTZELL, ROBERT CARTER, CHRIS WILLIAMS and BRIAN SMITH, Superintendent |
| 23-2972 |
| October 12, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant David Pannell. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 20-1313, 23-2990 [12] [7349857] [23-2972] (CAG) [Entered: 11/27/2023 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant David Pannell. [11] [7349855] [23-2972] (CAG) [Entered: 11/27/2023 02:46 PM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: This court received notice from the District Court that the appellant paid the required docketing fee. Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 12/18/2023 for David Pannell. Appellee's brief due on or before 01/16/2024 for Robert Carter, Sarah Eads, Keith Hartzell, Brian Smith, Superintendent and Chris Williams. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 02/06/2024 for Appellant David Pannell [10] [7348588] [23-2972] (CAG) [Entered: 11/17/2023 10:42 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Attorney Eric R. Shouse for Chris Williams, Brian Smith, Keith Hartzell, Sarah Eads and Robert Carter in 23-2972 terminated and added Attorney(s) Benjamin M. L. Jones for party(s) Appellee Chris Williams Appellee Sarah Eads Appellee Keith Hartzell Appellee Brian Smith Appellee Robert Carter, in case 23-2972 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Benjamin M.L. Jones for Appellees Robert Carter, Sarah Eads, Keith Hartzell, Brian Smith and Chris Williams. [9] [7348278] (L-Yes; E-No; R-Yes) [23-2972]--[Edited 11/16/2023 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Jones, Benjamin) [Entered: 11/16/2023 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 8 NOTICE: Circuit Rule 46(a) requires lead counsel be admitted to practice within 30 days of the date the appeal/petition was docketed. The rule also requires any attorney wishing to present oral argument to be admitted. Our records indicate as of this date Attorney Eric R. Shouse for Appellees Brian Smith, Robert Carter, Sarah Eads, Keith Hartzell and Chris Williams has/have not been admitted to practice in this court. Within 21 days, please file your application for admission by going to: https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/forms/forms7.htm and choosing the link, "Application for Admission to Practice in the Seventh Circuit". [8] [7348252] [23-2972] (CAH) [Entered: 11/16/2023 09:37 AM] |
|
Filing 7
ORDER: 1. Motion for extension of time to file docketing statement and transcript information sheet, filed on 11/6/2023. 2. Motion for extension of time to pay $505.00 filing fee, fiiled on 11/6/2023. To the extent that the appellant seeks an extension of time to file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement and transcript information sheet, the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellants docketing statement is due by November 27, 2023. Any transcript information sheet is also due by November 27, 2023. The clerk will send the appellant a transcript information sheet form. A review of the courts docket shows that on November 7, 2023, this court received confirmation from the district court that the appellant has paid the appellate filing fees. Accordingly, the motion for an extension of time to pay the appellate filing fees, will be filed without further court action. [ # 3 ] [ # 4 ] CDH [7] [7346701] [23-2972] (FP) [Entered: 11/08/2023 10:52 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Filed notice from the District Court that the $505.00 appellate fee was received. [6][7346494] [23-2972] (CAG) [Entered: 11/07/2023 01:53 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER re: Verified motion to dismiss without prejudice cause No. 23-2990 is repetitive and unnecessary, filed on 11/6/2023. On October 12, 2023, the appellant filed a notice of appeal from the district court's judgment, and appeal no. 23-2972 was opened. On October 16 2023, the appellant filed a second notice of appeal and a second appeal, 23-2990, was opened. Both filings seek to challenge the same district court judgment, and two separate appeals are not necessary. Accordingly, that appeal no. 23-2990 is administratively CLOSED. No appellate filing fees for appeal no. 23-2990 shall be imposed. [ # 7346218-2 ] [5] [7346415] [23-2972, 23-2990] (FP) [Entered: 11/07/2023 11:42 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David Pannell to extend time to pay the $505 filing fee. [4] [7346253] [23-2972] (CAG) [Entered: 11/06/2023 03:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David Pannell to extend time to file the docketing statement and transcript information sheet. [3] [7346186] [23-2972] (CAH) [Entered: 11/06/2023 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 2 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. sec. 1915(g), appellant may not proceed in forma pauperis. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the pro se appellant pay the required $505 fees to the clerk of the district court or this appeal will be dismissed pursuant to Circuit Rule 3(b). Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending resolution of appellant's fee status on appeal. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 10/26/2023. [2][7341425] [23-2972] (HTP) [Entered: 10/13/2023 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant David Pannell by 10/19/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 10/26/2023. [1] [7341421] [23-2972] (HTP) [Entered: 10/13/2023 09:45 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
