Seneca Insurance Company v. Celli Trucking Company, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY
Defendant / Appellee: CELLI TRUCKING COMPANY, CARLO CELLI, CELLI LEASING COMPANY, CELLI PETROLEUM COMPANY and TARA MARCANIO, as Independent Administrator of the estate of DOMINIC LOUIS MARCANIO
Case Number: 23-3041
Filed: October 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2023 Filing 12 Filed Response by Appellants Celli Enterprises, Inc., Celli Leasing Company, Celli Petroleum Company, Celli Trucking Company and Carlo Celli in 23-3071 to to the Court Order entered December 14, 2023. [12][7353847] [23-3071, 23-3041] (Genson, Sheila) [Entered: 12/15/2023 10:41 AM]
December 11, 2023 Filing 11 Filed status report by Appellant Seneca Insurance Company in 23-3041. [11] [7352660] [23-3041, 23-3071] (Sampen, Don) [Entered: 12/11/2023 09:50 AM]
November 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER re: Memorandum Responding to this Court's November 6 Order and Requesting Further Time to Respond. The court ORDERS attorney Don R. Sampen to file, on or before December 12, 2023, a status report regarding the district courts disposition of Seneca Insurance Companys Further Motion for Entry of Finality Order. JAF [10] [7348939] [23-3041] (AD) [Entered: 11/20/2023 04:02 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellants Celli Enterprises, Inc., Celli Leasing Company, Celli Petroleum Company, Celli Trucking Company and Carlo Celli in 23-3071. [9] [7348921] [23-3071, 23-3041] (Genson, Sheila) [Entered: 11/20/2023 03:46 PM]
November 20, 2023 Filing 8 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Seneca Insurance Company. [8] [7348892] [23-3041] (Sampen, Don) [Entered: 11/20/2023 03:18 PM]
November 13, 2023 Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Celli Enterprises, Inc., Celli Leasing Company, Celli Petroleum Company, Celli Trucking Company and Carlo Celli in 23-3071. [7] [7347320] [23-3071, 23-3041] (Genson, Sheila) [Entered: 11/13/2023 11:13 AM]
November 7, 2023 Filing 6 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Seneca Insurance Company. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. [6] [7346381] [23-3041] (Sampen, Don) [Entered: 11/07/2023 10:52 AM]
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Seneca Insurance Company shall file, on or before November 20, 2023, a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) JAF [7346087] [5] [7346087] [23-3041] (PS) [Entered: 11/06/2023 11:52 AM]
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). JAF [7346051] [4] [7346051] [23-3041] (AP) [Entered: 11/06/2023 10:55 AM]
November 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Circuit Rule 3(c)(1), referencing Circuit Rule 28(a), requires an appellant to file a docketing statement that provides information concerning the district courts jurisdiction. If jurisdiction depends on diversity, the statement must identify the jurisdictional amount and the citizenship of each party to the litigation. If any party is a corporation, the rule specifically requires the appellant to identify both the state of incorporation and the state in which the corporation has its principal place of business. And if any party is an unincorporated association or partnership, the statement must identify the citizenship of all members. In the present case, appellant Seneca Insurance Company relies on diversity of citizenship for federal jurisdiction. However, appellant's Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to identify the amount in controversy and the state of citizenship of the decedent Dominic Louis Marcanio. See 28 U.S.C.A. 1332(c)(2) ([T]he legal representative of the estate of a decedent shall be deemed to be a citizen only of the same State as the decedent . . .). Appellant must provide this information. Accordingly, appellant Seneca Insurance Company file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before November 14, 2023. JAF [3] [3] [7346030] [23-3041] (HTP) [Entered: 11/06/2023 10:27 AM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEE: Celli Enterprises, Incorporated. [2] [7343479] [23-3041] (MAN) [Entered: 10/24/2023 11:08 AM]
October 24, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet filed. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/04/2023 for Seneca Insurance Company. [1] [7343476] [23-3041] (MAN) [Entered: 10/24/2023 11:04 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Seneca Insurance Company v. Celli Trucking Company, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: SENECA INSURANCE COMPANY
Represented By: James J. Hickey
Represented By: Don R. Sampen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CELLI TRUCKING COMPANY
Represented By: Sheila Genson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CARLO CELLI
Represented By: Sheila Genson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CELLI LEASING COMPANY
Represented By: Sheila Genson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CELLI PETROLEUM COMPANY
Represented By: Zane D. Smith
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TARA MARCANIO, as Independent Administrator of the estate of DOMINIC LOUIS MARCANIO
Represented By: Brian LaCien
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?