Nicholas LaCruze v. Dushan Zatecky, et al
| NICHOLAS LACRUZE |
| DUSHAN ZATECKY, Superintendent, DUANE ALSIP, JONATHAN JACKSON, BOYD LUNSFORD, Officer, JASON GRIFFIN and AKILAH LAMAR |
| 23-3078 |
| October 27, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 30, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Rachel D. Johnson for Akilah Lamar, PsyD, Scott Levine, D.O., and Wexford of Indiana, LLC. [3] [7344750] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3078] (Bitner, Douglass) [Entered: 10/30/2023 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Eric Hammond, Misty Stamper, James Walker, Scott Levine, D.O., and Wexford of Indiana, LLC. [2] [7344645] [23-3078]--[Edited 10/30/2023 by HTP to add parties Levine and Wexford.] (HTP) [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:33 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Nicholas LaCruze by 11/02/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/27/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 11/13/2023. [1] [7344636] [23-3078] (HTP) [Entered: 10/30/2023 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
