Pete Taylor v. Nicholas Swise, et al
| PETE EARL TAYLOR |
| NICHOLAS SWISE and JUSTIN GALL |
| 23-3093 |
| October 30, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Pete Earl Taylor leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 12/28/2023. [9] [7356135] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 01/29/2024 [23-3093] (CAG) [Entered: 12/28/2023 03:43 PM] |
Filing 8
ORDER re: Motion of a Brady Violation, Ineffective Assistance of Counsel. [ # 5 ] This appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act and therefore all proceedings are suspended pending the assessment and payment of any necessary fees. See Newlin v. Helman, 123 F.3d 429, 434 (7th Cir. 1997). A review of the docket indicates that the appellants fee status has not yet been determined. Specifically, the appellants motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis is currently pending before the district court. Accordingly, any relief requested in the appellants motion is DENIED without court action, pursuant to this courts fee notice and order dated October 30, 2023. Should this appeal proceed to briefing, the appellant may make any arguments he believes have merit in his opening brief. Further, the appellant shall file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by December 27, 2023. The clerk will send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement so the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that must be included in a Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement. In his docketing statement, the appellant should attempt to provide the information listed in the Pro Se Instructions, particularly the date of the judgment or order being challenged in this appeal. [8] [7353453] CDH [23-3093] (AD) [Entered: 12/13/2023 03:03 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed prisoner trust fund account statement by Appellant Pete Earl Taylor. [7] [7353180] [23-3093] (CAH) [Entered: 12/12/2023 03:30 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER: TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. [6] [7353171] JR [23-3093] (CG) [Entered: 12/12/2023 03:17 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Pete Earl Taylor for Brady violation, ineffective assistance of counsel. [5] [7353158] [23-3093] (CAG) [Entered: 12/12/2023 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Pete Earl Taylor to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7353154] [23-3093] (CAG) [Entered: 12/12/2023 02:51 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joseph D. Bracey, Jr. for Appellees Nicholas Swise and Justin Gall. [3] [7349092] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3093] [Edited 11/21/2023 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Bracey, Joseph) [Entered: 11/21/2023 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 2 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Bhairav Radia for Appellees Nicholas Swise and Justin Gall. [2] [7349032] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3093] (Radia, Bhairav) [Entered: 11/21/2023 09:10 AM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Pete Earl Taylor by 11/06/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 11/29/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 11/13/2023. [1] [7345094] [23-3093] (AP) [Entered: 10/31/2023 02:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
