Santanu Das v. Tata Consultancy Services Limited, et al
SANTANU DAS |
TATA CONSULTANCY SERVICES LIMITED and AMIT BAJAJ |
23-3209 |
November 15, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Jobs |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney David M. Poell for Appellees Tata Consultancy Services Limited and Amit Bajaj. [11] [7357851] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3209] [11] [7357851] [23-3209]--[Edited 01/10/2024 by HTP to reflect addition of counsel.] (Poell, David) [Entered: 01/09/2024 04:32 PM] |
Filing 10 Statement of Jurisdiction filed by Appellant Santanu Das. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7353699] [23-3209] (Case, Kristin) [Entered: 12/14/2023 03:44 PM] |
Filing 9 ORDER: A review of the Amended Docketing Statement filed on December 12, 2023, reveals that it remains inadequate. In the present case, plaintiffs rely on diversity of citizenship for federal jurisdiction. However, appellant's Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement fails to provide sufficient information as to the business structure of Tata Consultancy Services Ltd. as a business entity created under the laws of India. Appellant shall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before December 20, 2023. (See order for further details). DW [9] [9] [7353548] [23-3209] (HTP) [Entered: 12/14/2023 10:39 AM] |
Filing 8 Amended Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Santanu Das. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [8] [7353219] [23-3209] (Case, Kristin) [Entered: 12/12/2023 04:36 PM] |
Filing 7 ORDER: Appellant Santanu Dasshall file a complete statement of jurisdiction that includes the omitted information. The statement is due on or before December 12, 2023. (See order for details) DW [7] [7351609] [23-3209] (AP) [Entered: 12/05/2023 11:57 AM] |
Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Santanu Das. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7350993] [23-3209] (Case, Kristin) [Entered: 12/01/2023 10:21 AM] |
Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Santanu Das is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Santanu Das by 12/14/2023. [5] [7350664] [23-3209] (AD) [Entered: 11/30/2023 07:57 AM] |
Filing 4 Added Attorney Shawn D. Fabian for Appellees Amit Bajaj and Tata Consultancy Services Limited, in case 23-3209 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Shawn D. Fabian for Appellees Amit Bajaj and Tata Consultancy Services Limited. [4] [7350496] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3209]--[Edited 11/29/2023 by MAN to reflect addition of counsel] (Fabian, Shawn) [Entered: 11/29/2023 01:10 PM] |
Filing 3 ORDER: Pursuant to Circuit Rule 33, briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 01/18/2024 for Santanu Das. Appellees' brief due on or before 02/12/2024 for Amit Bajaj and Tata Consultancy Services Limited. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 03/04/2024 for Appellant Santanu. Das JB [7349871] [23-3209] (FP) [Entered: 11/27/2023 02:54 PM] |
Filing 2 Notice of Circuit Rule 33 mediation issued. The mediation will be conducted via Zoom, Monday, December 18, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. Central Time. See Notice for further details and requirements. JB. [2] [7349867] [23-3209] (FP) [Entered: 11/27/2023 02:52 PM] |
Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Santanu Das by 11/21/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 11/29/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 12/26/2023 for Santanu Das [1] [7348322] [23-3209] (AP) [Entered: 11/16/2023 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.