Laurette Brown v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Plaintiff / Appellant: LAURETTE BROWN
Defendant / Appellee: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Case Number: 23-3239
Filed: November 21, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER re: Motion to extend time to file jurisdictional memorandum. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED only to the extent that the appellants jurisdictional memorandum is due by January 16, 2024. [ # 6 ] CDH [7] [7353557] [23-3239] (AP) [Entered: 12/14/2023 11:06 AM]
December 13, 2023 Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Laurette Brown to extend time to file jurisdictional memorandum. [6] [7353421] [23-3239] (PS) [Entered: 12/13/2023 02:09 PM]
December 11, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: Appellant Laurette Brown is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Laurette Brown by 12/26/2023. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 2956. [5] [7352760] [23-3239] (AD) [Entered: 12/11/2023 12:27 PM]
December 7, 2023 Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Laurette Brown. [4] [7352047] [23-3239] (AP) [Entered: 12/07/2023 09:19 AM]
December 1, 2023 Filing 3 Attorney Jeffery A. Simcox for Wisconsin Department of Transportation in 23-3239 terminated and added Attorney(s) Steven C. Kilpatrick for party(s) Appellee Wisconsin Department of Transportation, in case 23-3239 per appearance form. Appearance form filed by Attorney Steven C. Kilpatrick for Appellee Wisconsin Department of Transportation. [3] [7351158] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-3239]--[Edited 12/01/2023 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Kilpatrick, Steven) [Entered: 12/01/2023 03:50 PM]
November 27, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: The appellant, on or before December 12, 2023, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be suspended pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7349907] DW [2] [7349907] [23-3239] (CG) [Entered: 11/27/2023 03:22 PM]
November 21, 2023 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Laurette Brown by 11/27/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 12/05/2023. Appellant's brief due on or before 01/02/2024 for Laurette Brown. [1] [7349444] [23-3239] (CG) [Entered: 11/22/2023 11:53 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Laurette Brown v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: LAURETTE BROWN
Represented By: Laurette Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Represented By: Jeffery A. Simcox
Represented By: Steven C. Kilpatrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?