USA v. Daniel Gomez

USA v. Daniel Gomez

Plaintiff / Appellee:	UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:	DANIEL GOMEZ
Case Number:	23-3254
Filed:	November 22, 2023
Court:	U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit:	Other

RSS Track this Docket

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed	Document Text
November 28, 2023	Filing 2 ORDER: Defendant filed his notice of appeal pro se in this criminal action although he was represented in the district court by attorney Glenn Seiden. Counsel is reminded of his obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by this court upon a motion to withdraw. See Circuit Rule 51(a), (c). Counsel comply with the provisions of Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Counsel must file, no later than December 5, 2023, a Status Report regarding his compliance with this order. Attorney Glenn Seiden is advised that a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter must be attached to the Status Report, signed by the court reporter and indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed. DW [2] [7350141] [23-3254] (HTP) [Entered: 11/28/2023 11:48 AM]
November 22, 2023	Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daniel Gomez by 11/21/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/06/2023 for Appellant Daniel Gomez. Transcript information sheet due by 12/06/2023. [1] [7349763] [23-3254] (MAN) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:49 AM]

Date Filed

Document Text

November 28, 2023

Filing 2 ORDER: Defendant filed his notice of appeal pro se in this criminal action although he was represented in the district court by attorney Glenn Seiden. Counsel is reminded of his obligation to represent defendant on appeal unless specifically relieved by this court upon a motion to withdraw. See Circuit Rule 51(a), (c). Counsel comply with the provisions of Fed. R. App. P. 10(b) regarding the preparation of the transcripts. Counsel must file, no later than December 5, 2023, a Status Report regarding his compliance with this order. Attorney Glenn Seiden is advised that a copy of the Transcript Information Sheet submitted to the court reporter must be attached to the Status Report, signed by the court reporter and indicating the date the transcripts are expected to be completed. DW [2] [7350141] [23-3254] (HTP) [Entered: 11/28/2023 11:48 AM]

November 22, 2023

Filing 1 Criminal case docketed. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Daniel Gomez by 11/21/2023. Fee or IFP forms due on 12/06/2023 for Appellant Daniel Gomez. Transcript information sheet due by 12/06/2023. [1] [7349763] [23-3254] (MAN) [Entered: 11/27/2023 11:49 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: USA v. Daniel Gomez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By:	Tiffany Ardam
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: DANIEL GOMEZ
Represented By:	Glenn Seiden
Represented By:	Daniel Gomez
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?