Richard Gardipee v. Brown County Sheriff, et al
| RICHARD THOMAS GARDIPEE |
| BROWN COUNTY SHERIFF, BROWN COUNTY JAIL, ANTHONY EVERS, CHAPLAIN PALMERS and WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS |
| 23-3273 |
| November 28, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Sheriff Bowden; Sheriff Deputy Lee; Sheriff Deputy Olson; Lt. Trinkner; Sheriff Lt. Halasi; Sheriff Lieuntenant Sturm; Christopher Saldana; Kelsey Forelich; Cpl Vetsch; [3] [7350445] [23-3273] (FP) [Entered: 11/29/2023 11:36 AM] |
| Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7350422] (Note: The Office of the WI Attorney General has been notified of the filing of the appeal.) [23-3273] (FP) [Entered: 11/29/2023 10:57 AM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 12/12/2023. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Richard Thomas Gardipee by 12/04/2023. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 12/28/2023. [1] [7350417] [23-3273] (FP) [Entered: 11/29/2023 10:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
