Marquitta Meade v. Lesley Meade, et al
| LINCOLN LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON, formerly knowan as LIBERTY LIFE ASSURANCE COMPANY OF BOSTON and PROTECTIVE LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY |
| MARQUITTA MEADE |
| LESLEY MEADE, LAURENCE MEADE, LANCE MEADE, MILLICENT MEADE, ESTATE OF MARTHA M. MEADE and LESLEY A. MEADE |
| 23-3328 |
| December 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Insurance |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 Filed Non-Party Appellees Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Protective Life Insurance Company to Appellant's Jurisdictional Memorandum by Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Protective Life Insurance Company.. [7358876] [23-3328] (Wolanek, Caleb) [Entered: 01/16/2024 03:24 PM] |
| Filing 12 Amended Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Caleb C. Wolanek for Not Parties Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston and Protective Life Insurance Company. [12] [7358868] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [23-3328] (Wolanek, Caleb) [Entered: 01/16/2024 03:07 PM] |
| Filing 11 Jurisdictional memorandum Defendant-Appellees' response filed by Appellees Laurence Meade, Lesley A. Meade, Millicent Meade and Estate of Martha M. Meade to appellant's filing addresing the jurisdictional issue. [11] [7358721] [23-3328]--[Edited 01/16/2024 by ER - to reflect correct document title.] (Meade, Lesley) [Entered: 01/16/2024 10:38 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER re: Memorandum [ # 9 ]. Appellees shall file a response to appellants filing, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of 12/08/2023. Response due for Appellees Estate of Martha M. Meade, Lance Meade, Laurence Meade, Lesley Meade and Millicent Meade by 01/16/2024. DW [10] [7355082] [23-3328] (MAN) [Entered: 12/21/2023 10:56 AM]
|
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Ms. Marquitta Meade. [9] [7354863] [23-3328] (Meade, Marquitta) [Entered: 12/20/2023 03:50 PM] |
|
Filing 8
ORDER: re: Pro se defendant/petitioner's motion to file electronically. [ # 6 ] The motion is GRANTED. Appellant Marquitta Meade is granted leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the pro se litigants filing user status upon the termination of the case, termination of the litigants pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. LCE [8] [7354008] [23-3328] (CG) [Entered: 12/15/2023 04:03 PM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed notice from the District Court that the appeal docketing fee was received. [7] [7353994] [23-3328] (CAG) [Entered: 12/15/2023 03:48 PM] |
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ms. Marquitta Meade to become an electronic filer. [6] [7353716] [23-3328] (CAG) [Entered: 12/14/2023 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney Caleb C. Wolanek for Plaintiffs Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston andy Protective Life Insurance Company, in case 23-3328 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Caleb C. Wolanek for Not Parties Protective Life Insurance Company and Lincoln Life Assurance Company of Boston. [5] [7353145] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [23-3328]--[Edited 12/12/2023 by MAN to reflect addition of counsel] (Wolanek, Caleb) [Entered: 12/12/2023 02:41 PM] |
|
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant Marquitta Meade shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) [7352453] Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant Marquitta Meade by 12/22/2023. DW [4] [7352453] [23-3328] (MAN) [Entered: 12/08/2023 11:41 AM]
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [7352449] [3] [7352449] [23-3328] (MAN) [Entered: 12/08/2023 11:39 AM]
|
|
Filing 2
ORDER: On December 6, 2023, this court received the electronic transmission of the appellants notice of appeal and documents. A review of the district courts docket reveals that the appellant submitted $505.00 to the district court for the appellate docketing and filing fees. Although the appellants envelope indicates that the mailed notice of appeal was sent on November 30, 2023, the mailing wasnt received and filed by the district court until December 5, 2023. On December 1, 2023, the Court of Appeals Miscellaneous Fee Schedule (in accordance with 28 U.S.C. 1913) was updated to now reflect a $600.00 docketing fee along with the $5.00 filing fee for a notice of appeal. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the appellant shall pay the district court within the next 14 days an additional $100.00 needed for the appellate docketing fee. Briefing in this appeal will be SUSPENDED pending resolution of the appellants fee status on appeal. JR [2] [7352203] [23-3328] (ER) [Entered: 12/07/2023 01:29 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. (Appellant originally paid $505 to the district court - receipt #1892.) Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 12/20/2023. [1] [7352202] [23-3328] (ER) [Entered: 12/07/2023 01:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
