Mattie Lomax v. City of Chicago, et al
Plaintiff: MATTIE T. LOMAX
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO and LANDON HOWARD
Case Number: 24-1013
Filed: January 3, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Torts
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 28, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details). Diane P. Wood, Circuit Judge; Thomas L. Kirsch II, Circuit Judge and Candace Jackson-Akiwumi, Circuit Judge. [6] [7367169] [24-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 02/28/2024 02:13 PM]
February 7, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER: The court, on its own motion, orders plaintiff-appellant Mattie T. Lomax to show cause for her failure to respond to the courts order of January 17, 2024. Plaintiff- Appellant Mattie T. Lomax shall file her response on or before February 21, 2024. Appellant is advised that failure to respond may result in the dismissal of this appeal. The clerk is directed to attach a copy of the courts order of January 17, 2024, to appellants copy of this order. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7021 2720 0001 0402 9887. DW [5] [7363185] [24-1013] (CG) [Entered: 02/07/2024 02:47 PM]
January 18, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER: Appellant Mattie T. Lomax is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Mattie T. Lomax by 02/01/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 0150. [4] [7359320] [24-1013] (AD) [Entered: 01/18/2024 09:07 AM]
January 17, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER: Appellant, on or before January 31, 2024, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details). [7359258] DW [3] [7359258] [24-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 01/17/2024 04:24 PM]
January 3, 2024 Filing 2 This is notification that no appellee(s) or counsel for the appellee(s) were served in the District Court. [2] [7356851] [24-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 01/04/2024 10:08 AM]
January 3, 2024 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Mattie T. Lomax by 12/28/2023. Transcript information sheet due by 01/17/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/12/2024 for Mattie T. Lomax. [1] [7356849] [24-1013] (HTP) [Entered: 01/04/2024 10:05 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Mattie Lomax v. City of Chicago, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: MATTIE T. LOMAX
Represented By: Mattie T. Lomax
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF CHICAGO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LANDON HOWARD
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?