Alexander Carter, et al v. Cook County Sheriff, et al
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER CARTER, LAMARCUS CARGILL, JIMMY D. HITCHCOCK, DASHAUN RILEY and ARLAND SCOTT
Defendant: COOK COUNTY SHERIFF and COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Case Number: 24-1025
Filed: January 5, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 20, 2024 Filing 12 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellants Lamarcus Cargill, Alexander Carter, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott. [12] [7365384] [24-1025] (EF) [Entered: 02/20/2024 12:25 PM]
February 14, 2024 Filing 11 Appellant's brief filed by Appellants Lamarcus Cargill, Alexander Carter, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott. Paper copies due on 02/21/2024. Appellee's brief due on or before 03/15/2024 for Cook County Sheriff and Cook County, Illinois. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [11] [7364692] [24-1025] (KRA) [Entered: 02/15/2024 10:12 AM]
February 14, 2024 Filing 10 Submitted appellant brief by Kenneth N Flaxman for Appellants Lamarcus Cargill, Alexander Carter, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott in 24-1025. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7364619] [24-1025, 23-2785] (Flaxman, Kenneth) [Entered: 02/14/2024 09:20 PM]
January 23, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER re: 1) Motion to Consolidated Appeals in appeal no. 24-1025. 2) Defendants-Appellees' Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate in appeal no. 24-1025. [ # 5 ] The motion to consolidate is DENIED. The court may decide to schedule these appeals for oral argument on the same day before the same panel at a later date. SCR [9] [7360152] [23-2785, 24-1025] (AD) [Entered: 01/23/2024 09:21 AM]
January 22, 2024 Filing 8 Filed Response in Opposition by Appellees Cook County Sheriff and Cook County, Illinois to Plaintiffs' Motion to Consolidate. [8][7359871] [24-1025] (Wasserman, Jessica) [Entered: 01/22/2024 09:39 AM]
January 19, 2024 Filing 7 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Cook County Sheriff and Cook County, Illinois. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [7] [7359832] [24-1025] (JAD) [Entered: 01/19/2024 04:42 PM]
January 19, 2024 Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Jessica Wasserman for Appellees Cook County, Illinois and Cook County Sheriff. [6] [7359744] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1025][6] [7359744] [24-1025]--[Edited 01/19/2024 by HTP to reflect termination and addition of counsel.] (Wasserman, Jessica) [Entered: 01/19/2024 02:02 PM]
January 10, 2024 Filing 5 Motion filed by Appellant Alexander Carter to consolidate with Velleff v. Sheriff of Cook County, No. 23-2785. [5] [7358025] [24-1025] (Flaxman, Kenneth) [Entered: 01/10/2024 02:54 PM]
January 9, 2024 Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Kenneth N. Flaxman for Appellants Alexander Carter, Lamarcus Cargill, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott. [4] [7357773] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1025] (Flaxman, Kenneth) [Entered: 01/09/2024 01:03 PM]
January 9, 2024 Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joel A. Flaxman for Appellants Lamarcus Cargill, Alexander Carter, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott. for Charles Smith, Eugene Washington, Amy Won, and Deshawn Wright. [3] [7357716] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1025]--[Edited 01/09/2024 by FP to reflect that atty. Joel Flaxman is added to the docket.] (Flaxman, Joel) [Entered: 01/09/2024 10:51 AM]
January 5, 2024 Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLANTS: Charles Smith, Eugene Washington, Amy Won, Deshawn Wright. [2] [7357478] [24-1025] (FP) [Entered: 01/08/2024 11:26 AM]
January 5, 2024 Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. Fee Paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 01/19/2024. Appellants' brief due on or before 02/14/2024 for Lamarcus Cargill, Alexander Carter, Jimmy D. Hitchcock, Dashaun Riley and Arland Scott. [1] [7357466] [24-1025] (FP) [Entered: 01/08/2024 10:52 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Alexander Carter, et al v. Cook County Sheriff, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ALEXANDER CARTER
Represented By: Kenneth N. Flaxman
Represented By: Joel A. Flaxman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: LAMARCUS CARGILL
Represented By: Kenneth N. Flaxman
Represented By: Joel A. Flaxman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: JIMMY D. HITCHCOCK
Represented By: Kenneth N. Flaxman
Represented By: Joel A. Flaxman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DASHAUN RILEY
Represented By: Kenneth N. Flaxman
Represented By: Joel A. Flaxman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ARLAND SCOTT
Represented By: Kenneth N. Flaxman
Represented By: Joel A. Flaxman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COOK COUNTY SHERIFF
Represented By: Edward M. Brener
Represented By: Jessica L. Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS
Represented By: Edward M. Brener
Represented By: Jessica L. Wasserman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?