Donald Davis v. Ron Neal
RON NEAL, Warden |
DONALD DAVIS |
24-1060 |
January 16, 2024 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on January 16, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Applicant Donald Davis (pro se). [3] [7359095] [24-1060] (PS) [Entered: 01/17/2024 11:45 AM] |
Filing 2 Pro se motion filed by Applicant Donald Davis for exemption in accordance with Courts ruling. [2] [7359092] [24-1060] (PS) [Entered: 01/17/2024 11:40 AM] |
Filing 1 Application for an order authorizing the District Court to consider a second or successive petition for collateral review under 28 U.S.C. Section 2254 docketed. [1] [7359085] [24-1060] (PS) [Entered: 01/17/2024 11:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Donald Davis v. Ron Neal | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Applicant: DONALD DAVIS | |
Represented By: | Donald Davis |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: RON NEAL, Warden | |
Represented By: | Benjamin M. L. Jones |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.