Quentin Gillespie v. Jon Noble
| QUENTIN L. GILLESPIE |
| JON NOBLE |
| 24-1066 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER re: Jurisdictional Memorandum. [ # 5 ] This appeal shall proceed to a determination of whether a certificate of appealability should issue. The briefing schedule remains SUSPENDED pending further court order. DW [7362966] [24-1066] (PS) [Entered: 02/06/2024 03:11 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant Quentin L. Gillespie. [5] [7362686] [24-1066] (KRA) [Entered: 02/05/2024 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant Quentin L. Gillespie. [4] [7361834] [24-1066] (CAH) [Entered: 01/31/2024 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Quentin L. Gillespie leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 01/18/2024. [3] [7359514] [24-1066] (AP) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:15 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant, on or before February 1, 2024, shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing shall be SUSPENDED pending further court order. If appellant wishes to request an extension of time in which to file the notice of appeal, he should file an appropriate motion in the district court, not this court, as soon as possible. Appellants jurisdictional memorandum should include a discussion of the status of any such motion. In the alternative, appellant Quentin Gillespie must inform the court both whether the prison has a system designed for legal mail and whether he used it to file his notice of appeal. Additionally, appellant Gillespie also must provide a notarized statement or a declaration under penalty of perjury (in compliance with 28 U.S.C. 1746) setting forth the date the notice of appeal was deposited in the prisons internal mail system and stating whether first class postage was prepaid. See Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure 4(c). Appellants notarized statement or declaration shall be filed on or before February 1, 2024. (See order for further details) DW [2] [2] [7359462] [24-1066] (PS) [Entered: 01/18/2024 02:19 PM]
|
| Filing 1 State prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 12/13/2023. IFP pending in the District Court. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 01/31/2024. [1] [7359247] [24-1066] (PS) [Entered: 01/17/2024 03:45 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Quentin Gillespie v. Jon Noble | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: QUENTIN L. GILLESPIE | |
| Represented By: | Quentin L. Gillespie |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: JON NOBLE | |
| Represented By: | Michael J. Conway |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
