Shannon Wayne Agofsky v. Steve Kallis
| SHANNON W. AGOFSKY and SHANNON WAYNE AGOFSKY |
| STEVE KALLIS, Warden |
| 24-1067 |
| January 17, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus: Death Penalty |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Appellant's brief filed by Appellant Shannon Wayne Agofsky. Paper copies due on 03/18/2024. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [7] [7369408] [24-1067] (GW) [Entered: 03/11/2024 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 6 Submitted appellant brief by David Zuckerman for Appellant Shannon Wayne Agofsky. [6] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7369380] [24-1067] (Zuckerman, David) [Entered: 03/11/2024 04:03 PM] |
Filing 5
ORDER: Briefing will proceed as follows: Appellant's brief due on or before 03/11/2024 for Shannon Wayne Agofsky. Appellee's brief due on or before 04/10/2024 for Steve Kallis, Warden. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/01/2024 for Appellant Shannon Wayne Agofsky. ENN [7361276] [24-1067] (AP) [Entered: 01/29/2024 11:56 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Shannon W. Agofsky. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 8th Cir: US v. Agofsky, No. 92-3767; Agofsky v. US, No. 12-1397 (under seal); Agofsky v. US, No. 16-2185. 5th Cir: US v. Agofsky, No. 04-41219; US v. Agofsky, No. 07-40330. 10th Cir: Agofsky v. Justin Jones, et al., No. 12-6311 (under seal) [4] [7360603] [24-1067] (Zuckerman, David) [Entered: 01/24/2024 04:07 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Claudia Van Wyk for Shannon W. Agofsky in 24-1067 terminated and added Attorney(s) David L. Zuckerman for party(s) Appellant Shannon W. Agofsky, in case 24-1067 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure statement and Appearance form filed by Attorney David Zuckerman for Appellant Shannon W. Agofsky. [3] [7360568] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1067]--[Edited 01/24/2024 by AD to reflect the termination and addition of counsel and proper document filed.] (Zuckerman, David) [Entered: 01/24/2024 02:48 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: The court notes that petitioner Shannon W. Agofsky was represented in the district court by court-appointed attorney Claudia Van Wyk. Attorney Claudia Van Wyk filed a notice of appeal and apparently will represent petitioner Shannon W. Agofsky in this appeal. Accordingly, Counsel is reminded to seek reappointment in this court if she intends to seek compensation under the Criminal Justice Act for her work on appeal. See Johnson v. Chandler, 487 F.3d 1037 (7th Cir. 2007). DW [2] [7359519] [24-1067] (CG) [Entered: 01/18/2024 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's habeas corpus case docketed. IFP. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Shannon W. Agofsky by 01/24/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 02/26/2024 for Shannon W. Agofsky. Transcript information sheet due by 01/31/2024. [1] [7359407] [24-1067] (AP) [Entered: 01/18/2024 12:38 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
