Ricardo Pittman v. USPS, et al
| RICARDO PITTMAN |
| UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE, LOUIS DEJOY, Postmaster General, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ANNE RICHMOND |
| 24-1088 |
| January 22, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 29, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellant's brief [ # 11 ] Appellant's brief due on or before 04/04/2024 for Ricardo Pittman. Appellees' brief due on or before 05/06/2024 for Louis DeJoy, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service and United States of America. Appellant's reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/28/2024 for Appellant Ricardo Pittman. CDH [12] [7367405] [24-1088] (MAN) [Entered: 02/29/2024 01:37 PM]
|
| Filing 11 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ricardo Pittman to extend time to file appellant's brief. [11] [7367232] [24-1088] (CAG) [Entered: 02/28/2024 04:03 PM] |
| Filing 10 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees Louis DeJoy, USA and USPS. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [10] [7363943] [24-1088] (Souza, Abraham) [Entered: 02/12/2024 11:52 AM] |
| Filing 9 Amended Notice of appeal filed by Appellant Ricardo Pittman, per order. [9] [7362007] [24-1088] (AP) [Entered: 02/01/2024 12:20 PM] |
| Filing 8 INSTANTER ORDER re: Motion to amend noa. IT IS ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED to the extent that the clerk will treat the tendered amended notice of appeal as a supplement. The clerk shall file INSTANTER the supplement to the notice of appeal. [ # 7 ] CDH [8] [7362003] [24-1088] (AP) [Entered: 02/01/2024 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 7 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Ricardo Pittman to amend notice of appeal. [7] [7361846] [24-1088] (CAG) [Entered: 01/31/2024 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Ricardo Pittman, per order. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7361395] [24-1088] (MAN) [Entered: 01/29/2024 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Instanter order issued GRANTING Appellant's Motion for Leave to File His Docketing Statement [ # 3 ]. The clerk shall file INSTANTER the tendered docketing statement of the appellant. CDH [5] [7361387] [24-1088] (MAN) [Entered: 01/29/2024 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 4 Jurisdictional statement filed by Appellant Ricardo Pittman. [4] [7361323] [24-1088] (KRA) [Entered: 01/29/2024 01:22 PM] |
| Filing 3 Prose motion filed by Party Ricardo Pittman for leave to file his docketing statement. One copy docketing statement tendered. [3] [7361322] [24-1088] (KRA) [Entered: 01/29/2024 01:18 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. Redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken and may result in disciplinary sanctions. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). DW [7359984] [2] [7359984] [24-1088] (MAN) [Entered: 01/22/2024 12:35 PM]
|
| Filing 1 U.S. civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Ricardo Pittman by 01/17/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 02/05/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/04/2024 for Ricardo Pittman. [1] [7359982] [24-1088] (MAN) [Entered: 01/22/2024 12:30 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
