Shedrick Bowes-Northern v. City of Chicago, et al
| SHEDRICK BOWES-NORTHERN |
| CITY OF CHICAGO, COOK COUNTY, ILLINOIS, JOEL GORDILS, #8451 Chicago Police Officer, ZAUL QUIROZ, #6631 Chicago Police Officer and ANATHEA SMITH, #19338 Chicago Police Department |
| 24-1112 |
| January 24, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 20, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER: Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern is directed to showcause as to why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution pursuant to C. R. 31(c)(2). SK. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. Response to Rule to Showcause due for Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern by 04/03/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7020 3160 0001 5911 4738. [9] [7371121] [24-1112] (SK) [Entered: 03/20/2024 08:54 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Docketing Statement filed by Appellees City of Chicago, Cook County, Illinois, Joel Gordils, Zaul Quiroz and Anathea Smith. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 22-2991 [8] [7365045] [24-1112] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 02/16/2024 12:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 Appearance form filed by Attorney Briana Leatherberry for Appellee Cook County, Illinois. [7] [7364750] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1112] [Edited 02/15/2024 by CG to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Leatherberry, Briana) [Entered: 02/15/2024 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 6 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [6] [7363453] [24-1112] (JR) [Entered: 02/08/2024 01:58 PM] |
|
Filing 5
ORDER: Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern by 02/22/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 0433. [5] [7363288] [24-1112] (AD) [Entered: 02/08/2024 08:09 AM]
|
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney SUZANNE M. LOOSE for Appellees City of Chicago, Joel Gordils, Zaul Quiroz and Anathea Smith. Additional Parties: Tracy Drew, Kory Pierce. [4] [7362190] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1112]--[Edited 02/02/2024 by PS - to reflect the termination and addition of counsel.] (Loose, Suzanne) [Entered: 02/02/2024 09:38 AM] |
|
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7360750] DW [3] [7360750] [24-1112] (AD) [Entered: 01/25/2024 12:40 PM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Angela Hearts-Glass, Tracy Drew, Kory Pierce, Cook County Department of Corrections, Thomas Dart, Ronald Cavanaugh, Kevin Heywood and Unknown Cook County Department of Corrections Officer. [2] [7360749] [24-1112] (AD) [Entered: 01/25/2024 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. IFP. Transcript information sheet due by 02/07/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Shedrick Bowes-Northern by 01/31/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/04/2024 for Shedrick Bowes-Northern. [1] [7360747] [24-1112] (AD) [Entered: 01/25/2024 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
