City of Hammond, et al v. Lake County Board of Elections, et al
| THOMAS MCDERMOTT, EDUARDO FONTANEZ, LONNIE RANDOLPH and CITY OF HAMMOND, INDIANA |
| LAKE COUNTY BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DIEGO MORALES, Secretary of State, in his official capacity and STATE OF INDIANA |
| 24-1125 |
| January 29, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Constitutionality of State Statutes |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 25, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
Order issued GRANTING motion to extend time to file appellees' briefs [ # 13 ] Appellees' briefs due on or before 05/10/2024 for Lake County Board of Elections, Diego Morales and State of Indiana. Appellants' reply brief, if any, is due on or before 05/31/2024 for Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. CDH [14] [7372003] [24-1125] (FP) [Entered: 03/25/2024 11:54 AM]
|
| Filing 13 Motion filed by Appellees State of Indiana, Diego Morales and Lake County Board of Elections to extend time to file appellee brief. [13] [7371725] [24-1125] (Barta, James) [Entered: 03/22/2024 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 12 Paper copies of appellant brief filed by Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [12] [7370090] [24-1125] (EF) [Entered: 03/14/2024 11:56 AM] |
| Filing 11 Appellant's brief filed by Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. Appellee's brief due on or before 04/10/2024 for Lake County Board of Elections, Diego Morales and State of Indiana. Paper copies due on 03/18/2024. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [11] [7369337] [24-1125] (LJ) [Entered: 03/11/2024 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 10 Submitted appellant brief by Bryan H. Babb for Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [10] NOTE: Access to this entry is limited to counsel of record. Once the document is approved by the court, it will be filed onto the court's docket as a separate entry which will be open to the public. [7369286] [24-1125] (Babb, Bryan) [Entered: 03/11/2024 02:26 PM] |
| Filing 9 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Michael E. Tolbert for Appellee Lake County Board of Elections. [9] [7362179] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125] (Tolbert, Michael) [Entered: 02/02/2024 09:13 AM] |
| Filing 8 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Bradley Dick for Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [8] [7362040] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125]--[Edited 02/01/2024 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Dick, Bradley) [Entered: 02/01/2024 01:29 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Seema Shah for party(s) Appellant Eduardo Fontanez Appellant Lonnie Randolph Appellant Thomas McDermott Appellant City of Hammond, Indiana, in case 24-1125 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Seema Shah for Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [7] [7361820] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125]--[Edited 01/31/2024 by AD to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Shah, Seema) [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 Appearance form filed by Attorney Katelyn E. Doering for Appellees State of Indiana and Diego Morales. [6] [7361802] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125] [Edited 01/31/2024 by ER - added Attorney Katelyn E. Doering] (Doering, Katelyn) [Entered: 01/31/2024 02:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellants Eduardo Fontanez, City of Hammond, Indiana, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [5] [7361695] [24-1125] (Drohosky, Stacy) [Entered: 01/31/2024 08:32 AM] |
| Filing 4 Appearance form filed by Attorney James A. Barta for Appellees State of Indiana and Diego Morales. [4] [7361666] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125]--[Edited 01/30/2024 by PS - to reflect the addition of counsel.] (Barta, James) [Entered: 01/30/2024 04:23 PM] |
| Filing 3 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Bryan H. Babb for Appellants City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [3] [7361642] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1125] (Babb, Bryan) [Entered: 01/30/2024 03:25 PM] |
|
Filing 2
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7361338] [2] [7361338] [24-1125] (HTP) [Entered: 01/29/2024 02:03 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 02/12/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 03/11/2024 for City of Hammond, Indiana, Eduardo Fontanez, Thomas McDermott and Lonnie Randolph. [1] [7361304] [24-1125] (HTP) [Entered: 01/29/2024 12:43 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
