David Gevas v. John Varga, et al
| DAVID C. GEVAS |
| JOHN VARGA, SONJA NICKLAUS, JUSTIN WILKS and JOHN DOES |
| 24-1276 |
| February 21, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 19 Mandate issued. No record to be returned. [19] [7377372] [24-1276] (CAH) [Entered: 04/19/2024 09:43 AM] |
| FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 03/28/2024 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7377374-2] [7377374] [24-1276] (CAH) [Entered: 04/19/2024 09:47 AM] |
Filing 18
ORDER: 1. Motion for explanation, filed on 4/3/2024. 2. Motion to return filing fee, filed on 4/4/2024. The motions are DENIED. [ # 16 ] [ # 17 ] JXK [18] [7374611] [24-1276] (FP) [Entered: 04/05/2024 04:14 PM]
|
| Filing 17 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David C. Gevas to return filing fee. [17] [7374274] [24-1276] (CAH) [Entered: 04/04/2024 04:01 PM] |
| Filing 16 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David C. Gevas for clarification. [16] [7373990] [24-1276] (CAG) [Entered: 04/03/2024 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 15 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant David C. Gevas. Prior or Related proceedings: No. [15] [7373464] [24-1276] (EF) [Entered: 04/01/2024 03:48 PM] |
Filing 14
ORDER: This appeal is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. (See order for further details). Frank H. Easterbrook, Circuit Judge; Ilana Diamond Rovner, Circuit Judge and Michael Y. Scudder, Circuit Judge. [14] [7372657] [24-1276] (FP) [Entered: 03/28/2024 10:13 AM]
|
Filing 13
ORDER: Appellant David C. Gevas is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant David C. Gevas by 04/08/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 0822. [13] [7372010] [24-1276] (AD) [Entered: 03/25/2024 12:04 PM]
|
| Filing 12 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellees Sonja Nicklaus, John Varga and Justin Wilks. [12] [7371233] [24-1276] (Bieszczat, Frank) [Entered: 03/20/2024 12:57 PM] |
| Filing 11 Appearance form filed by Attorney Frank H. Bieszczat for Appellees Sonja Nicklaus, John Varga and Justin Wilks. [11] [7371140] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-Yes) [24-1276] --[Edited 03/20/2024 by ER - terminated Attorney Nadine J. Wichern and added Attorney Frank H. Bieszczat.] (Bieszczat, Frank) [Entered: 03/20/2024 09:17 AM] |
Filing 10
ORDER: The appellees shall file, on or before March 20, 2024, a response to appellants jurisdictional memorandum, addressing the jurisdictional issue raised in the courts order of March 1, 2024. JXK [10] [7369882] [24-1276] (FP) [Entered: 03/13/2024 02:24 PM]
|
| Filing 9 Jurisdictional memorandum filed by Appellant David C. Gevas. [9] [7369370] [24-1276] (CAG) [Entered: 03/11/2024 03:56 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed District Court order dated 03/07/2024 with forwarded copy of document #159. The Clerk of this Court is directed to send Plaintiff's petition for permission to appeal [159] to the Clerk of the Seventh Circuit for entry in Plaintiff's appellate case No. 24-1276. (See order for further details.) Forwarded to JXK. [8] [7368776] [24-1276]--[NOTE: The petition for permission to appeal is being separately assigned appeal no. 24-8006.] (JR) [Entered: 03/07/2024 02:32 PM] |
Filing 7
ORDER re: Motion for extension of time. [ # 5 ] The motion is GRANTED to the extent that the appellant shall file his Circuit Rule 3(c) docketing statement by March 19, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant this courts instructions for preparing a docketing statement, so that the appellant may familiarize himself with the information that should be included in a docketing statement. A review of the courts docket shows that on February 29, 2024, the court received confirmation that the appellant paid the $605.00 appellate fees in the district court. The appellant is reminded that the filing of a motion for appointment of counsel does not relieve him of the obligation to respond to the courts order dated March 1, 2024. The clerk shall send the appellant a copy of the courts public docket. CDH [7] [7368102] [24-1276] (CG) [Entered: 03/05/2024 10:10 AM]
|
| Filing 6 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David C. Gevas for appointment of counsel. [6] [7367939] [24-1276] (DAB) [Entered: 03/04/2024 03:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 Pro se motion filed by Appellant David C. Gevas to extend time to file docketing statement. [5] [7367937] [24-1276] (DAB) [Entered: 03/04/2024 03:16 PM] |
Filing 4
ORDER: Appellant David C. Gevas shall file a brief memorandum stating why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. A motion for voluntary dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 42(b) will satisfy this requirement. Briefing is SUSPENDED pending further court order. (See order for further details) Jurisdictional memorandum due for Appellant David C. Gevas by 03/15/2024. JXK [7367619] [4] [7367619] [24-1276] (MAN) [Entered: 03/01/2024 12:54 PM]
|
| Filing 3 Filed notice from the District Court that the $605.00 appellate fee was received. [3][7367477] [24-1276] (CAG) [Entered: 02/29/2024 04:33 PM] |
| Filing 2 No attorney(s) added for Appellee John Does, per District Court docket and information sheet. [2] [7365958] [24-1276] (ER) [Entered: 02/22/2024 12:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 State prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant David C. Gevas by 02/28/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 03/22/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 03/06/2024. [1] [7365955] [24-1276] (ER) [Entered: 02/22/2024 12:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.