William Viehweg v. Insurance Programs Management Group, LLC, et al
| WILLIAM H. VIEHWEG |
| INSURANCE PROGRAMS MANAGEMENT GROUP, LLC, JOHN SKERTICH, JOE BERRY, BRADLEY G. HUMMERT and HENRY MEISENHEIMER & GENDE, INC. |
| 24-1287 |
| February 23, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| William Viehweg v. Insurance Programs Management Group, LLC |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 10 copies Appellant's brief filed by Appellant William H. Viehweg. Appellee's brief due on or before 05/06/2024 for Joe Berry, Henry Meisenheimer & Gende, Inc., Bradley G. Hummert, Insurance Programs Management Group, LLC and John Skertich. REMINDER: If a case is designated to proceed to oral argument, hearing notices will be mailed shortly before the date of oral argument. Please note that counsel's unavailability for oral argument must be submitted by letter, filed electronically with the Clerk's Office, no later than the filing of the appellant's brief in a criminal case and the filing of an appellee's brief in a civil case. See Cir. R. 34(b)(3). The court's calendar is located at https://www.ca7.uscourts.gov/cal/argcalendar.pdf. Once scheduled, oral argument is rescheduled only in extraordinary circumstances. See Cir. R. 34(b)(4), (e). [10] [7374591] [24-1287] (EF) [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:33 PM] |
Filing 9
ORDER re: Appellants combined motion to disqualify attorney Joseph D. Bracey, Jr. and IFMK Law, Ltd.; and attorneys John P. Cunningham and Daniel G. Hasenstab, and Brown & James, P.C. [ # 8 ] The motion is DENIED. JXK [9] [7370655] [24-1287] (PS) [Entered: 03/18/2024 11:36 AM]
|
| Filing 8 Pro se motion filed by Appellant William H. Viehweg to disqualify attorney Joseph Bracey Jr. and IFMK Law LTD, and attorneys John P. Cunningham and Daniel G. Hasenstab and Brown & James. [8] [7370178] [24-1287] (CAG) [Entered: 03/14/2024 02:32 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Seventh Circuit Transcript Information Sheet by Appellant William H. Viehweg. [7] [7369073] [24-1287] (HTP) [Entered: 03/08/2024 03:11 PM] |
| Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney John P. Cunningham, Daniel G. Hasenstab for Appellees Henry Meisenheimer & Gende, Inc. and Bradley G. Hummert. for Brown & James, P.C., John P. Cunningham, and Daniel G. Hasenstab. Additional Parties: Brown & James, P.C., John P. Cunningham, and Daniel G. Hasenstab. [6] [7367698] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1287]--[Edited 03/01/2024 by FP to reflect that atty. Cunningham is added to the docket.] (Cunningham, John) [Entered: 03/01/2024 03:28 PM] |
| Filing 5 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Joseph D. Bracey, Jr. for Appellees Joe Berry, Ronald Bone (incorrectlly captioned as "Jeff Bone"), Joseph Bracey, Chuck Cox, John Goldacker, Howard Hall, Insurance Program Managers Group, LLC (incorrectly captioned as "Insurance Programs Management Group, LLC"), Benjamin Jacobi, City of Mt. Olive, Illinois, Molly Margaritis, Karen McNaught, Lawrence Neyland, Dan O'Brien, O'Halloran Kossoff Geitner & Cook, LLC, Ernie Parish, Gregg Peterson, Steve Remer, John Skertich, Marcia Schulte, Richard Webb, Leah Wheatley, and Melinda Zippay. [5] [7367162] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1287]- to correct party text listed and attach correct pdf file.] (Bracey, Joseph) [Entered: 02/28/2024 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 4 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Bhairav Radia for Appellees Joe Berry, Ronald Bone (incorrectlly captioned as "Jeff Bone"), Joseph Bracey, Chuck Cox, John Goldacker, Howard Hall, Insurance Program Managers Group, LLC (incorrectly captioned as "Insurance Programs Management Group, LLC"), Benjamin Jacobi, City of Mt. Olive, Illinois, Molly Margaritis, Karen McNaught, Lawrence Neyland, Dan O'Brien, O'Halloran Kossoff Geitner & Cook, LLC, Ernie Parish, Gregg Peterson, Steve Remer, John Skertich, Marcia Schulte, Richard Webb, Leah Wheatley, and Melinda Zippay. [4] [7367161] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1287]--[Edited 02/28/2024 by JAD - to correct party text listed, attach correct pdf file and Add attorney Bhairav Radia to the docket.] (Radia, Bhairav) [Entered: 02/28/2024 01:53 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7366431] DW [3] [7366431] [24-1287] (CG) [Entered: 02/26/2024 10:11 AM]
|
| Filing 2 THIS CAUSE CONSISTS OF MORE THAN 5 PARTIES FOR EITHER SIDE. The following are those parties to this cause as reflected on the District Court docket, yet are not reflected on the Appellate docket/caption for administrative purposes: APPELLEES: Melinda Zippay, Marcia Schulte, Howard Hall, Richard Webb, Steve Remer, Ernie Parish, Leah Wheatley, John Goldacker, Chuck Cox, Dan O'Brien, Molly Margaritas, Jeff Bone, O'Holloran Kosoff Geitner & Cook, LLC, Karen McNaughtJoseph Bracey, Brown & James, P.C., John P. Cunningham, Daniel G. Hasenstab, Gregg Peterson, Jane Doe 1-10, John Doe 11-20. [2] [7366429] [24-1287] (CG) [Entered: 02/26/2024 10:04 AM] |
| Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee paid. Docketing statement filed. Transcript information sheet due by 03/08/2024. Appellant's brief due on or before 04/03/2024 for William H. Viehweg. [1] [7366417] [24-1287] (CG) [Entered: 02/26/2024 09:38 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.