Dennis Merritt v. Joseph Grady, et al
Plaintiff: DENNIS R. MERRITT
Defendant: JOSEPH GRADY, Judge, BRADLEY DAVID, Judge, ANGELA MINELLA, JOHN PESKIND and MICHAEL C. DOYEN
Case Number: 24-1308
Filed: February 28, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
Nature of Suit: Civil (Rico)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 5, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER re: Motion to voluntarily withdraw appeal. [ # 13 ] This cause is DISMISSED pursuant to F.R.A.P. 42(b). Mandate issued, no record to be returned. [14][7374574] [24-1308] (PS) [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:17 PM]
April 5, 2024 Filing 13 Motion filed by Appellant Dennis R. Merritt Leave to withdraw appeal 24-1308 without prejudice. Appellees Bradley David, Michael C. Doyen, Joseph Grady, Angela Minella, John Peskind and [13] [7374404] [24-1308]--[Edited 04/05/2024 by MAN to reflect correct filer] (Merritt, Dennis) [Entered: 04/05/2024 10:08 AM]
April 5, 2024 FOR COURT USE ONLY: Certified copy of 04/05/2024 Final Order with Mandate sent to the District Court Clerk. [7374588-2] [7374588] [24-1308] (PS) [Entered: 04/05/2024 03:27 PM]
March 22, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER re: Motion for clarification of jurisdiction on appeal prior to submission of payment. [ # 10 ] The motion for clarification is DENIED. If appellant believes that there is no jurisdiction to bring his appeal, he may dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). Once the appeal is dismissed, however, the appellant cannot reinstate it at a later date. See Barrow v. Falck, 977 F.2d 1100, 1103 (7th Cir. 1992). Furthermore, any preliminary determination of jurisdiction is subject to reevaluation by the panel assigned to decide this case on the merits, after briefing. See Brown v. Fifth Third Bank, 730 F.3d 698, 701 (7th Cir. 2013) (Posner, J., in chambers). JXK [12] [7371787] [24-1308] (PS) [Entered: 03/22/2024 03:13 PM]
March 21, 2024 Filing 11 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/04/2024 for Appellant Dennis R. Merritt. [11] [7371327] [24-1308] (AD) [Entered: 03/21/2024 08:29 AM]
March 19, 2024 Filing 10 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Dennis R. Merritt Motion for Clarification on Jurisdiction of minute order. [10] [7371083] [24-1308] (Merritt, Dennis) [Entered: 03/19/2024 04:41 PM]
March 4, 2024 Filing 8 Added Attorney John Pavletic for Appellee Angela Minella, in case 24-1308 per disclosure statement. Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney John Pavletic for Appellee Angela Minella. for Michael Minella; Gail Minella. Additional Parties: Michael Minella; Gail Minella. [8] [7367887] (L-No; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1308]--[Edited 03/04/2024 by MAN to reflect addition of counsel] (Pavletic, John) [Entered: 03/04/2024 01:41 PM]
March 4, 2024 Filing 7 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Terence Campbell for Appellee Angela Minella. for Michael Minella; Gail Minella. Additional Parties: Michael Minella; Gail Minella. [7] [7367885] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1308] (Campbell, Terence) [Entered: 03/04/2024 01:34 PM]
March 4, 2024 Filing 6 Circuit Rule 26.1 Disclosure Statement and Appearance filed by Attorney Chris S Wunder for Appellee John Peskind. Additional Parties: Peskind Law Firm. [6] [7367853] (L-Yes; E-Yes; R-No) [24-1308] (Wunder, Christopher) [Entered: 03/04/2024 12:01 PM]
March 4, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER re: Motion for leave to become an electronic filer, filed on 2/29/2024. The motion is GRANTED. Appellant Dennis Merritt is granted leave to use the Electronic Case Filing system for filing material in this appeal. This courts Electronic Case Filing Procedures, the Electronic Case Filing User Manual, and answers to frequently asked questions regarding Electronic Case Filing are available at the Seventh Circuits web site: http://www.ca7.uscourts.gov. The court will terminate the pro se litigants filing user status upon the termination of the case, termination of the litigants pro se status, or for any abuse of filing privileges. [ # 3 ] LCE [5] [7367837] [24-1308] (FP) [Entered: 03/04/2024 11:44 AM]
March 4, 2024 Filing 4 Docketing Statement filed by Appellant Dennis R. Merritt. Prior or Related proceedings: Yes. 24-8002 [4] [7367749] [24-1308] (JR) [Entered: 03/04/2024 08:50 AM]
February 29, 2024 Filing 3 Pro se motion filed by Appellant Dennis R. Merritt in 24-1308 & 24-8002 for leave to become an electronic filer. [3] [7367362] [24-1308, 24-8002] (JR) [Entered: 02/29/2024 11:47 AM]
February 28, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER: A review of the short record reveals that this appeal involves more than one appellee represented by different counsel. Counsel for appellees are encouraged to file a joint brief and appendix or adopt parts of a co-appellee's brief. The parties are reminded that redundant and uncoordinated briefing will be stricken. See United States v. Torres, 170 F.3d 749 (7th Cir. 1999); United States v. Ashman, 964 F.2d 596 (7th Cir. 1992). [7367186] DW [2] [7367186] [24-1308] (FP) [Entered: 02/28/2024 02:39 PM]
February 28, 2024 Filing 1 Private civil case docketed. Fee due. Transcript information sheet due by 03/13/2024. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Dennis R. Merritt by 03/06/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/13/2024 for Appellant Dennis R. Merritt. [1] [7367147] [24-1308] (FP) [Entered: 02/28/2024 12:58 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Dennis Merritt v. Joseph Grady, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: DENNIS R. MERRITT
Represented By: Dennis R. Merritt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOSEPH GRADY, Judge
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRADLEY DAVID, Judge
Represented By: Nadine J. Wichern
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANGELA MINELLA
Represented By: Terence H. Campbell
Represented By: John Nicholas Pavletic Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN PESKIND
Represented By: Christopher S. Wunder
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MICHAEL C. DOYEN
Represented By: Michael C. Doyen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?