Franshon Stapleton v. USA
| FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON |
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
| 24-1361 |
| March 8, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prisoner Petition-Vacate Sentence |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 22, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 8
ORDER: Appellant Franshon Stapleton is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 05/06/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 1102. [8] [7377702] [24-1361] (AD) [Entered: 04/22/2024 10:57 AM]
|
| Filing 7 Filed District Court order GRANTING Appellant Franshon Stapleton leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP granted: 04/10/2024. [7] [7377683] [24-1361, 24-1501] (AP) [Entered: 04/22/2024 10:31 AM] |
Filing 6
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [6] [7374905] [24-1361, 24-1501] (CG) [Entered: 04/08/2024 04:49 PM]
|
| Filing 5 Filed letter from regarding case. [5] [7374889] [24-1361] (DAB) [Entered: 04/08/2024 04:34 PM] |
| Filing 4 Prose motion filed by Appellant Franshon Stapleton in 24-1361, 24-1501 to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [4] [7374853] [24-1361, 24-1501] (CAH) [Entered: 04/08/2024 04:02 PM] |
| Filing 3 Issued Circuit Rule 3(b) 14 day notice to file a motion for leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis or pay the docketing fee in the District Court. Fee or IFP forms due on 04/16/2024 for Appellant Franshon Stapleton. [3] [7373551] [24-1361] (AD) [Entered: 04/02/2024 09:36 AM] |
Filing 2
ORDER: Appellant Franshon Stapleton is directed to file the overdue Docketing Statement within 14 days from the date of this Rule to Show Cause. Docketing statement response due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 04/08/2024. Sent Certified Mail. Receipt Number: 7022 0410 0003 3396 0839. [2] [7372011] [24-1361] (AD) [Entered: 03/25/2024 12:09 PM]
|
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's 2255 case docketed. Certificate of Appealability denied 01/11/2024. Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Franshon Stapleton by 03/15/2024. Fee or IFP forms due on 03/22/2024 for Appellant Franshon Stapleton. Transcript information sheet due by 03/22/2024. [1] [7369191] [24-1361] (CG) [Entered: 03/11/2024 10:34 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Franshon Stapleton v. USA | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: FRANSHON STAPLETON, also known as SHON, also known as BIG SHON, also known as BIRD, also known as BIG BIRD, also known a B.O.N., also known as CHRIS, also known as FRANSOHN STAPLETON | |
| Represented By: | Franshon Stapleton |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | Jeffrey Kienstra |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.