Marquis Thompson v. Sheyde Perry, et al
| MARQUIS THOMPSON |
| SHEYDE PERRY, TERRY COLLINS and DANIELLE MERRIFIELD |
| 24-1385 |
| March 12, 2024 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| Marquis Thompson v Sheyde Perry |
| Marquis Thompson v Sheyde Perry |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 9, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed District Court order DENYING Appellant Marquis Thompson leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. Date IFP denied: 04/09/2024. [4] [7375122] PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 05/09/2024 [24-1385] (CAG) [Entered: 04/09/2024 03:21 PM] |
Filing 3
ORDER issued TRANSFERRING the motion for leave to appeal in forma pauperis on appeal to the clerk of the District Court for ruling in the first instance. JR [3] [7374840] [24-1385] (CG) [Entered: 04/08/2024 03:49 PM]
|
| Filing 2 Prose motion filed by Appellant Marquis Thompson to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. [2] [7374810] [24-1385] (DAB) [Entered: 04/08/2024 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 1 Federal prisoner's civil rights case docketed. IT IS ORDERED that this appeal is subject to the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Proceedings are SUSPENDED pending notification by the district court that any necessary fee has been assessed, and if assessed, paid. PLRA Fee due. Docketing Statement due for Appellant Marquis Thompson by 03/18/2024. Transcript information sheet due by 03/26/2024. PLRA Fee/Motion/Memorandum due on 04/11/2024. [1] [7369766] [24-1385] (PS) [Entered: 03/13/2024 09:57 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
